Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 20

February 20

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, without replacing the invocations. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scoutbasketball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be a non-notable website with no evidence of being reliable, with the template being used for possible WP:Spam. Created by User:Ricardomm2 (suspected WP:SOCK), and used by User:Ricardomm (suspected sockmaster). —Bagumba (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's my !vote, PC-XT. "Scoutbasketball.com" is not the same thing as the widely known, used and cited recruiting evaluation service "Scout.com." Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Deletion without replacement seems appropriate, here, due to the promotion and sock concerns as well as the source, itself, being questionable. —PC-XT+ 19:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sorry, it's my faul. I'll read carefully the conditions before editing. Ricardomm (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

English association football captain navboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leicester City F.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bolton Wanderers F.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:West Ham United F.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Thames Ironworks F.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Newcastle United F.C. captains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Further to recent consensus, this is FANCRUFT and not a useful guide to navigation. GiantSnowman 18:23, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox GP2 team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's unnecessary duplication of the Template:Infobox motor racing team. Also in the case of ART Grand Prix which will join Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters, I think that DTM will be definetely more important series than GP2 Series. Cybervoron (talk) 13:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.