Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 11

June 11

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete/merge with {{Rail-interchange}}Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NYCS-bull-flex (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on four mainspace pages. Can be replaced with {{Rail-interchange}} or {{NYCS-bull-small}}. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 08:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The set of templates this is part of (Category:Station layout templates) is only used on about 10 mainspace pages. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 08:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging with Template:NYCS-bull-small. Epic Genius (talk) ± 12:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can this really be true when Template:NYCS-bull-small is being merged with Template:Rail-interchange? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensusPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PL constituency (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template should not be deleted or merged since there are unique characteristics and nomenclature not available within the generic template. It is the same reason why Template:Infobox UK constituency and Template:Infobox French constituency and Template:Infobox Grand National Assembly of Turkey electoral district exist. Plus we're in the middle of rolling it out due to the Fall 2015 General Elections in Poland. Ajh1492 (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previous TfDs for this template:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensusPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox T&W Metro station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox T&W Metro station with Template:Infobox station.

Previous TfDs for this template:

There is no reason to have a separate and nearly identical infobox for every country and rail system.

Since the last nomination of {{Infobox T&W Metro station}}, closed as keep due to parameter issues, most of the missing parameters have been added to {{Infobox station}}, making the T&W infobox redundant except for |metrosince= (corollary |reopened= in {{Infobox station/sandbox}}), |escalator= (little-used, will probably not be merged as irrelevant) and the multiple usage fields (rarely used and in need of updating; can be replaced by built-in {{Rail pass box}} or multiple transclusions of it in |mpassengers=). Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 07:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good example or not; its an example where something worked (at least for some pages), and it was "fixed" - so now it doesnt work* for other pages (eg. Gentofte station). The idea that "one fits them all" doesnt work. (* doesnt work means looks ugly; the title "Gentofte" and "S-train station" are not centered). Christian75 (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please explain what "one size fits all" has got to do with the icon at Gentofte and this discussion. Alakzi (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • The nominator wants to merge a template into a unstable template. {{Infobox station}} is broken, and at the talk page I got the answer it was because of technical reasons. I am against merging anything into a broken template/module. Gentofte station illustrates that the template is broken. Christian75 (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Christian75: If the infobox really was "unstable" it wouldn't be template-protected. If you think it looks ugly and want the problem to be fixed somehow, then please continue the discussion at Template talk:Infobox station where you started it. Not here; the header text being 10px off-centre is entirely irrelevant here because the infobox nominated for merger does not need to use it and has never used anything like it. (Is it even necessary to have both |type= and the symbols?) Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 08:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteNorth America1000 05:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Delaware counties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded template for three counties, the three counties are linked from a section in {{Delaware}} as is done for all other states. Dough4872 03:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteNorth America1000 05:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Sunset Tree tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and offers no navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.