Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 22

June 22

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 04:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWE Programming (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overkill. The main WWE template has all of this stuff covered in it, and 2 templates regarding the same topic seems redundant to me. Vjmlhds 18:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 July 3Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Principle CW-radar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one article, info can be transcluded there The Banner talk 14:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The template should be deleted now. Per WP:TMP, it should include "Wiki markup to be included on several pages via transclusion". It is no longer used on any page and is not likely to be used on any other page.96.52.0.249 (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 04:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Casual Vacancy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete as unused. Bazj (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 04:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GKDLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1. The creator of the template says, "There are now no links to it and the German equivalent has been deleted (presumably superseded) so I think we can safely bin this one". See "User talk:Bermicourt#Template:GKDLink"
2. 0 transclusion(s) found. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 02:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.