Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 12

< March 11	March 13 >

March 12

Template:India national football team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:India national football team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a standard template for articles within WP:FOOTBALL. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Templates are not done for national teams unless its a major tournament. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ArsenalFan700, Inter&anthro will World Cup 2018 qualifier/AFC qualifier be counted as a major tournament?? If yes, then I can re-edit the name of the template. Waiting for your replies :) Thank you.Suman420 (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. They do not count. Squad templates are only made for international squads during the actual tournaments so until India makes the Asian Cup or World Cup again we do not need squad templates. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 07:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then there is no use of it :) I thought it could be handy. Suman420 (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, not required. Giant Snowman 09:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox UK Fire and Rescue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 22. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox UK Fire and Rescue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox fire department (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox county fire service (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Star Trek film crew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Harry Potter film crew (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Star Wars film crew (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Star Trek film crew (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not really coherent groups, and these shouldn't be encouraged, the same way we do not have cast navboxes. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' per nom and other discussion. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and other discussion. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:NAVBOX. Betty Logan (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 16#Template:James Bond film crew --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FM radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FM radio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template which linked only to a bunch of categories, which were recently deleted in CfD. Serves no further navigational purpose with no transclusions Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the kind of thing you can just G6 as "housekeeping". Alakzi (talk) 03:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, ok. I tried to G8 it, but was told to take it to TFD. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Alakzi, I believe that WP:G6 is supposed to be narrowly interpreted, but I certainly would not object if a passing administrator believes otherwise. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've successfully had navboxes without any blue links speedy-deleted before. The admin who's handling most G6 requests is quite sensible. Alakzi (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nominator's rationale. Unused, unlinked, unloved. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.