Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 17

May 17

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Supermodel International (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template that navigates to one article. Other blue links have been deleted or redirected at AfD. • Gene93k (talk) 09:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medium-size metropolitan area roads templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Highways in the Capital District, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Annapolis, Maryland Roads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Baton Rouge Highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Metro Birmingham expressways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Peoria expressways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Providence freeways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Tulsa Area Highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:SLC highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates should be deleted because they are not necessary in articles—Categories are sufficient for organizing these links—and because they cause problems with tracking what pages link where. Many of these templates have been deleted recently, starting with the Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here.  V 04:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.