Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 19
November 19
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Trick 'r Treat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Can be dealt with through standard linking. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; use a See also section if necessary. - HyperGaruda (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge. All three link to the same base URL, so all that is left is the elink format itself. {{PubChemLink}} seems to have the most information (and follows the general format seen in templates like {{facebook}}), but that can be further decided on the talk page. Since there is the possibility of using SID, the base template will be at {{PubChem}} to allow for future expansion. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Template:PubChemCID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PubChem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:PubChemLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:PubChemCID with Template:PubChem.
Possible functionality duplication. Djadjko (talk) 00:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- They produce three different results (eg prefix is PubChem or CID, external links). What will that be after the merge? -DePiep (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Combined two prior redundant discussions, will poke relevant wikiprojects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Opabinia regalis (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Merge. I can't see any reason for more than one template to link to a PubChem listing. There are two types of listings, CIDs and SIDs, but if links to either are desired, that could be handled by a single template as well. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Unused and redundant; the Philosophy WikiProject now use the standard archive box. Alakzi (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - HyperGaruda (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).