Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 21

November 21

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No content, and can be recreated when (and if) there are actually articles to link to. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a helpful template. There are seven links to sub-articles, none of which exist. The main article (List of scandals in Malaysia) contains fewer than 10 items, so it seems unlikely they'll need to be created any time soon. Relentlessly (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well, List of scandals in Malaysia was created on 11 October 2015, so we can't say if it's unlikely or not. However, the template doesn't link to the particular scandals, but to yet-to-be-created overview articles per decade. In this form it isn't helpful. PanchoS (talk) 06:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G4 by Kusma (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One wikilink in a template, unnecessary JMHamo (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete based on previous discussion as well as other closes on this page. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

was only used in a few articles, and fb team templates are deprecated, so I replaced it with simple team links. it is now unused, so not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No need for only a wikilink in a template. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 04:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

was only used in two articles, and fb team templates are deprecated, so I replaced it with simple team links. it is now unused, so not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Nov 29Primefac (talk) 05:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unused templates created by a user with very few contributions to the project, and obsessed with violating WP:SIGNT (see the history for Template:Quackers). Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Wikilinks should not be stored as templates. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One wikilink in a template, unnecessary JMHamo (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Wikilinks should not be stored as templates. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The wikilink contained can be substituted in the one article it's used in; no need for this template JMHamo (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete G2: Test page (non-admin closure) JMHamo (talk) 20:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, broken external link template. — This, that and the other (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete, clear editing test, and probably self-promotion considering the username of the creator. Frietjes (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).