Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 10

September 10

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 20:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template with just one entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Jenks24 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary Infobox template that's used only once twice JMHamo (talk) 11:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the template below for the same reason...

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 11:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JMHamo: Used twice, actually (likewise for the CR7 template), but judging by consensus at WT:FOOTBALL they should probably be deleted. Davykamanzitalkcontribsalter ego 11:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_19#Template:Graham Chapman. ~ RobTalk 20:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to provide useful navigation Rob Sinden (talk) 09:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was replace and delete. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 06:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Almost identical to Template:Renewable energy sources except more space consuming and less logically ordered (i.e. Topics by country between Tidal and Wave power). Only used in one article, where it can be substituted with the widely used version. ELEKHHT 07:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 20:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With only an article on one of the band's albums, navigation isn't helped by this navbox. WP:NENAN. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).