Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 6

August 6

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was mergePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Specific time with Template:Specify.
1. This template is used only on 4 pages, even though it exists since 2008. 2. As can be seen from the usage, it is not always a specific time that is needed, sometimes it is a specific duration of time. 3. The obvious solution for both issues is using the more general "Specify". Debresser (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded – Cricket World Cups (and equivalents from other sports) don't have navboxes listing the teams in a particular tournament, I see no reason why this minor tournament should. IgnorantArmies (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

was only being used on two user pages (now replaced). it's broken after updates to {{stack begin}} and {{stack end}} (changed from tables to divs). Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 05:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links in the template. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).