Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 14
December 14
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete after converting the articles to use {{Taxonbar}} as discussed. ~ Rob13Talk 01:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:TaxonIds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per the discussion at Template talk:TaxonIds, this template is redundant to {{taxonbar}}, and in many cases, both are being employed on the same page. To fix the duplication, I suggest we replace {{taxonIds}} with {{taxonbar}}. Of course, I don't suggest deleting this template until the migration is complete. Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stemonitis, MichaK, Rkitko, Plantdrew, and Tobias1984: who participated in the discussion on the talk page. Frietjes (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- support migration/deletion – it's redundant to {{taxonbar}}, as noted. (Personally I'd get rid of that template too, but I suspect this is a minority view.) Peter coxhead (talk) 07:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- support deletion after migration, as stated on Template talk:TaxonIds. Is anyone actively working on the migration to taxonbar? MichaK (talk) 09:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support migration/deletion. Note that TaxonIDs sometimes has links that aren't yet in Wikidata (and thus won't show up in taxonbar); the migration process should probably include getting these IDs into Wikidata (creating a maintenance category along the lines of Category:Encyclopedia of Life ID not in Wikidata might facilitate this). Plantdrew (talk) 18:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support migration/deletion. There are about 7,075 transclusions of this template right now, though, so the migration sounds pretty painful, but it'd be great to have all that data safely in Wikidata. It looks like the fastest way there would be to (1) add {{WikidataCheck}} to identify data that Wikidata doesn't have yet (I tried this just now), (2) to put in a request at User:JJMC89 bot/Wikidata external link template parameter removal to automatically move the data over, and then (3) to delete all instances of this template. I'd love to put some time into this, but I'm completely swamped for the next couple of months --- but if it's not done by then, feel free to ping me and see if I have more time available then! -- Gaurav (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- delete. I does not contain useful data. It is possible to replace TaxonIds with taxonbar in all gastropod articles immediately. --Snek01 (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 23 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:1943 college football independents records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
This is *not* a template. This looks like an article. I don't see anything worth keeping it it. Naraht (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- delete, or move to article space then delete. Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
This is a redundant template. The purpose of this is served by Template:Vietnam-tv-bio-stub and in any case, it doesn't seem to be used. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- delete, or redirect. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Fabrictramp (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Not a working template. Not sure what this was supposed to do... Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:25, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Not a working template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:25, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This seems unnecessary because Template:Infobox sports league already exists and is more general. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox storm small (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox storm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox storm small with Template:Infobox storm.
There is no reason for a 2nd template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Completely unrelated templates. Infobox storm small is for hurricanes, while Infobox storm is for tornadoes, tornadoes themselves, winter storms and such. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 17:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- @MarioProtIV: are you sure? Because {{Infobox storm small}} has 1 article transclusion... --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- @MarioProtIV: in fact your argument makes no sense at all... {{Infobox hurricane}} is what hurricanes use...--Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- @MarioProtIV: are you sure? Because {{Infobox storm small}} has 1 article transclusion... --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- delete, {{infobox storm small}} has apparently been orphaned during this discussion so must not be needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox SMAS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template is not used. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's not clear what this infobox is supposed to be used for. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused. No indication of what the intended use was supposed to be. Safiel (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).