Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 4

< December 3	December 5 >

December 4

Ununtrium etc. element name templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move and delete the redirects Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ununtrium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ununpentium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ununseptium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ununoctium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Delete~~. These are temporal, abandoned names for chemical elements. The elements now have definitive names. No use for these any more. Not used in content pages, documentation missing. DePiep (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, withdrawn. Let's and Move & /doc them. (Must say, I've never seen one member of this family being used). -DePiep (talk)

Me neither (and coicidentally today I also learned about {{CO2}} and friends that I've likewise never used). But I also took the opportunity to fix 3 others that weren't properly in the cat. DMacks (talk) 08:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to the new names {{Nihonium}}, {{Moscovium}}, {{Tennessine}}, and {{Oganesson}} (changing the contents appropriately). Double sharp (talk) 02:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Double sharp to maintain the complete Category:Chemical element symbol templates set. DMacks (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move Alas, these slipped through the cracks when WP:ELEMENTS worker-bees sifted through the numerous articles that needed to be renamed or have content changed after the recent IUPAC announcement finalizing the element names. If it weren't for this discussion already being started, I'd say just WP:BB and move them. Any chance of closing this per WP:SNOW and then moving them? YBG (talk) 06:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I Boldly moved (and fixed the content analogously). Question Should we bother keeping redirects? I left them for now, since we're discussing them and I'm involved. DMacks (talk) 08:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there is much harm in keeping the redirects, though clearly there is not much benefit, because there's not much chance of the redirect ever being used or even searched for. YBG (talk) 21:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the Redirects. Confusion & distraction only, should not be used. -DePiep (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, that's probably for the best. YBG (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parasitic animals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parasitic animals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Either this is woefully incomplete or the title is misleading. Only lists 2 animals, out of thousands of parasites. "Hematophagous vertebrates would be a more appropriate title for the included articles, but we do really need a navigation template for that? Plantdrew (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, would be too large if completed. Frietjes (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ReadPersondata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ReadPersondata (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Persondata was deprecated by this RfC, which closed on May 26, 2015. Dabao qian (talk) 18:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we no longer use persondata. Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ak icon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 11 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ak icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Weather Table for Brumado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weather Table for Brumado (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. GXXF T • C 17:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, duplicates Brumado#Climate. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spacing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spacing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{copyedit}}. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{copyedit}}. [Note for what it's worth: I am a coordinator for the WP:GOCE.]– Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to {{copyedit}} as redundant, per nom. Miniapolis 00:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, the description says that it's for "when {{Copyedit}}, {{Prose}}, and {{Sections}} don't quite fit the bill". It doesn't give any examples of when this might happen, though, and there is only one transclusion in the mainspace, which looks like it could be easily replaced by {{Copy edit}} and possibly {{Prose}}. In conclusion: redirect to {{copyedit}}. Eman 235/talk 19:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Melbourne bike path

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Melbourne bike path (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is too narrow. Replace with {{Template:Infobox cycling path}}. Rangasyd (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

history merge with the newly created Template:Infobox cycling path. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bristol railway map/collapse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bristol railway map/collapse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains template with one hardcoded parameter. Replace with {{Bristol railway map|collapse=yes}}. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 11:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

replace and delete. Frietjes (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-DOT-FAA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-USGov-DOT-FAA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 08:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. if it's PD it should be at commons. Frietjes (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clash of Clans characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy del as empty navbox czar 08:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clash of Clans characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation between a series of articles that are likely to be deleted soon as a WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE violation. ViperSnake151 Talk 06:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Gestrid (talk) 09:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the articles are still not deleted. →SeniorStar (talk) 11:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep if the articles are kept, and delete if the articles are deleted. the cart goes after the horse. Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm positive that all characters will be deleted, but also @Frietjes, video game characters do not have their own navboxes, as notable characters are part of a series' navbox (i.e., {{Street Fighter series}}). soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-Military-DVIC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-USGov-Military-DVIC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. if it's PD it should be at commons. Frietjes (talk) 17:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-POTUS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-USGov-POTUS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused copyright tag, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 03:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. if it's PD it should be at commons. Frietjes (talk) 17:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SKI2012riders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge / delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SKI2012riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Outdated template without real use. The riders in the 2012 group are there. That information isn't going to change. There is no reason to have a template (even if used on multiple pages) to convey information that is completely static. The Banner talk 00:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see reasons here, at the other nomination. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 19:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

merge with the article and delete as was decided last month. for templates used on more than one page, we can use LST, as was decided last month. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).