Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 March 6

March 6

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 08:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This soccer team was dissolved in 2011, so a roster isn't needed anymore. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisting here. ~ RobTalk 01:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only three films, and interlinking is already provided in the articles themselves, including by linking to a common article Cube (film series) and a common category Category:Cube (film series), so this is serious overkill. Debresser (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment there are four articles; so WP:CLN, just because a category exists doesn't mean a navbox can't exist. There seems to be two or three films in various states of production, Cubed and Cube3D , and Cub3d (or that's a title of one of the other two) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).