Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 29

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< October 28 October 30 >

October 29

edit

Template:Tfd-mbox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 23:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-helpful tfd notice that should be incorporated as a possible value for the |type= parameter in {{tfd}} if kept. Pppery 23:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DNA2016riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GPC2013riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GPC2014riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OGE2016riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OPW2014riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PAC2016riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TIB2014riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TPO2013riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UHC2016riders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template only used once, in List of 2016 UCI Women's Teams and riders. Text can be transcluded there. The Banner talk 22:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep for now, and merge/delete once the season is over. going forward, it would probably be good to use Help:LST to avoid the need to create all these single-season rider list templates, but still have the benefit of having the information in one place. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U-boat War Badge with Diamonds

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 23:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template comparable to recently deleted template "Combined Pilots-Observation Badge with Diamonds"; pls see TfD discussion.

The article U-boat War Badge lists the recipients of the Diamond award and is sufficient. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Playmates of 1961

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation templates are supposed to help you navigate between multiple articles. This template effectively gives you a choice between Christa Speck and List of Playboy Playmates of 1961 (11x). In this state superfluous. The Banner talk 11:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative to removal: remove the links to the playmates, leaving only the part the links to the "List of Playboy Playmates of ...". The Banner talk 18:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural keep. We really need to be looking at all of these similar templates, of which there are many. I think they should all be merged to one template, which only contains the different year articles, but I'd prefer a single mass-nomination to handle that. Would you be good with that, The Banner? ~ Rob13Talk 21:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural delete See below // Original comment -- yes, others are questionable too, but that's not a reason to keep this one. Most of the links in the templates are not to individual articles, but instead are to monthly sections of annual collection of playmates. The list article themselves look like fancruft, with such intricate detail as Hips/Bust/Waist measurements. By looking at this as a test case, that's a delete for me. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • @K.e.coffman: The reason I want these considered together is because we've had many cases at TfD and CfD where things are brought up at separate times and get two different outcomes. This often happens when different groups of editors happen to show up to the second related discussion. When that happens, we're left with a situation where, for instance, this 1961 template is deleted but all the others are kept. I think it's obvious that's the worst possible outcome, since it doesn't please either side and is horribly inconsistent. ~ Rob13Talk 07:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural keep (in view of above) but implement the nom's suggestion to "remove the links to the playmates, leaving only the part the links to the "List of Playboy Playmates of ...". 07:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)K.e.coffman (talk)
  • Comment K.e.coffman, that basically leaves you with {{Playboy Playmates by year}}, so you're effectively saying that you want to delete the nominated template and replace it with this one. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose this is also relevant to BU Rob13 - thoughts? Primefac (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Calendar, clock, date and time computing templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 5 ~ Rob13Talk 23:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cypriot Third Division

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Rob13Talk 23:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and not part of the highest level of football. As well as every page in the "seasons". Pyrusca (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Cypriot Third Division is one of the three main divisions of the Cypriot football which are organized by Cyprus Football Association. It is not a regional league competition to be considered as not significant. It is the 3rd highest league of the country, and teams from all around Cyprus are participating. That level of competitions i believe that are matching wikipedia rules, and as i know many similar articles (for other countries football competitions) already exist without any of them to be proposed for deletion. Also, since sources were added to all Cypriot Third Division "seasons" articles, i believe that the articles are OK and complete, so there is no any reason now to be deleted. Marios26 (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Bundesheer

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 23:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template that is very similar and / or a subset of the template recently deleted at TfD: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_11#Template:Knight.27s_Cross_recipients_in_the_Bundeswehr_and_Bundesgrenzschutz. Should be likewise deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cork NHL Team 1972

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

content is an exact copy of {{Cork NHL Team 1974}}, including the title. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sepahanmainkit

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semi Finals

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Secondary Schools

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

provides little navigation. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sidebar Entertainment industry in Puerto Rico

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semi-wikibreak (simple)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 5 ~ Rob13Talk 23:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_29&oldid=1073153612"