Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 12

< September 11	September 13 >

September 12

Template:Ra'anana Express roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ra'anana Express roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ra'anana Express (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

mostly redlinks and out-of-date. Frietjes (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Newbie-biting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newbie-biting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Summary2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Summary2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-standard & redundant user warning Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A neat, clear prose form way of providing the warning, particularily if the user doesn't get the hint the first time from Template:Uw-editsummary -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Non-standard messages are greatly to be welcomed. Thincat (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Handy informal message, will use myself in future. W C M_email 07:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Whats new?, Thincat, and Wee Curry Monster: What does this template offer, above {{Summary}}? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pigsonthewing: If a user ignores {{Summary}}, this gives a secondary option for redelivering the notice in the hope they get the message. -- Whats new?^(talk) 02:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Signposts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 September 20 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Signposts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SLW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SLW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-standard user warning Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Redirtypo-warn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. No need to relist and quabble over whether to redirect or delete, as redirects are cheap. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redirtypo-warn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-standard user warning Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the almost identical {{Db-redirtypo-notice}}. Don't delete as this would be an {{R with history}}. Uanfala (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Redundancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redundancy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Historic, non-standard user warning. And, er, redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nspp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nspp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, non-standard user warning Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian Rebellion of 1857

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indian Rebellion of 1857 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Okay this is Indian Rebellion of 1857. What next? Redirect or delete? Marvellous Spider-Man 09:15, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NYTtopic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NYTtopic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is just a template for search engine results which is contrary to WP:EL. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Links to a single publication's curated page on a topic. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Complies with the second paragraph of WP:EL; WP:ELNO #9 doesn't apply here. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Not search engine results. These are links to topic pages. Search engine queries act on any search terms one cares to enter. Topic pages do not, as the topic must alteady exist in a pre-defined list of keys. In the case of the NYT, their limited list of topics can be reviewed at http://www.nytimes.com/pages/topics/ using the alphabar within the subject areas of People, Places, Subjects and Organizations:

"Each topic page collects all the news, reference and archival information, photos, graphics, audio and video files published on topics ranging from A M Castle & Company to Zyuganov, Gennadi A. This treasure trove is available without charge on articles going back to 1981." Flatterworld (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guardian topic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Guardian topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is just a template for search engine results which is contrary to WP:EL. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Links to a single publication's curated page on a topic. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Complies with the second paragraph of WP:EL; WP:ELNO #9 doesn't apply here. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Not search engine results. These are links to topic pages. Search engine queries act on any search terms one cares to enter. Topic pages do not, as the topic must alteady exist in a pre-defined list of keys. Flatterworld (talk) 02:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).