Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 December 29

< December 28	December 30 >

December 29

Template:Bnr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bnr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yeproc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 January 7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yeproc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:IUCN status

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Courtesy re-list at TfD instead of MfD. Original nomination follows:[reply]

Unused/undeveloped module ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 03:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Module tagged (finally). {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've forgotten how I found this module, but it would be worth tracking down the calling template (it isn't {{IUCN status}}) and TfDing that too. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 11:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 10:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Discovery Communications Nordic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discovery Communications Nordic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Already listed on main Discovery Communications template. User 261115 (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To evaluate issues of accesibility(if any)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 10:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Immigration to Sri Lanka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ethnic groups in Sri Lanka. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Immigration to Sri Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ethnic groups in Sri Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Immigration to Sri Lanka with Template:Ethnic groups in Sri Lanka.
The template should be merged with Template:Ethnic groups in Sri Lanka. One template should include all of this information as to make it easier for the reader to navigate to articles related to the ethnic groups of Sri Lanka instead of having two. The other "Ethnic groups in (insert country name)" have one template. A merged template on the lines of this conveys the information (articles) in one setting. (120.144.142.148 (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 10:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support The separation of the two templates is not needed and they should be merged together. I also want to add that the "Immigration" template in a way also implies those of non-indigenous descent (Moors, Indian Tamils, Malays, Chinese etc.) are not "Sri Lankan" when in reality they are. They are grouped with expatriate populations as if they are all the same and implies those groups mentioned above are not citizens which is incorrect. (121.219.130.48 (talk) 08:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Support--Antan O 08:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Huntsville-Decatur Metropolitan Area

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Huntsville-Decatur Metropolitan Area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No evidence of necessity. I haven't found any exact policy for this, but it appears to be the only template of its kind; the only ones I have found are for metro areas, which makes more sense. If someone knows of a policy for this, please list it here. If best, the material should be split into Template:Huntsville metropolitan area (or Huntsville, Alabama metropolitan area) and Template:Decatur, Alabama metropolitan area. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and split per nom.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 02:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 10:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

don't split, Huntsville, Alabama metropolitan area is a redirect to Huntsville, Alabama where as Huntsville-Decatur-Albertville is a valid statistical area. I have no problem with deleting this template outright, but we shouldn't be splitting into invented subregions. Frietjes (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).