Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< January 29 January 31 >

January 30

edit

Template:San Francisco Metro Markets

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such term "San Francisco Metro Markets" in the radio business, as distinguished from Template:San Francisco Radio. Radio signals don't reach over the hills which separate the San Francisco Bay from Diablo Valley, Gilroy, Hollister and Santa Rosa. Distance prevents radio signals being shared between San Francisco and San Jose. To me, this looks like a continuation of the disruption that was seen from User:Geoffrey100 who was blocked indefinitely for stuff like trying to extend the San Francisco radio region to include a larger area. Binksternet (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template can be speedily deleted as it was created by User:TomG2002, now blocked as a sock of banned User:Pablo909 who also socked as Geoffrey100, mentioned above. Binksternet (talk) 02:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 PIHA Pro playoffs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy, procedural nomination. Unused, as all pages that transcluded it have apparently been deleted. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013–14 PIHA Pro season by team

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy, procedural nomination. Unused, as all pages that transcluded it have apparently been deleted. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012–13 SECRHL Division II standings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy, procedural nomination. Unused, as all pages that transcluded it have apparently been deleted Primefac (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012–13 SCHL Division II standings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy, procedural nomination. Unused, as all pages that transcluded it have apparently been deleted. Primefac (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2011–12 GPCIHL Division I standings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy, procedural nomination. Unused, as all pages that transcluded it have apparently been deleted. Primefac (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GodTube

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems like overkill for situations where a simple link would suffice. FASTILY 00:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek Q stories

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 February 7 Primefac (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transportation in North Alabama

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better suited by a category. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here. Rschen7754 00:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_30&oldid=1087817502"