Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 July 2

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< July 1 July 3 >

July 2

edit

Template:Braintree Town F.C. squad

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One wiki-link does not aid navigation. Redundant. JMHamo (talk) 22:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jazz Radio Stations in Massachusetts

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Merge discussions may be evaluated at talk. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one entry Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Stations change formats all the time & there may also be stations in this format which aren't listed because they're not known about to the editors. Also, having this provides a more comprehensive list of stations' formats in Massachusetts.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AddendumThere is nothing in WP:TCSD which warrants the deletion of this template.Stereorock (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thumb firmly in the middle. Actually, with the format footer at the bottom, there are sixteen links in the template, but point taken. Seems to me a logical solution would be to combine the Jazz and Smooth Jazz templates, which would end up with three stations total. Mlaffs (talk) 21:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not opposed to that suggestion.Stereorock (talk) 01:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TenPoundHammer:Sure there's a navigational purpose: in each of the (Radio Format) in Massachusetts page that has a template, there is a link to all available templates, including Jazz stations in New Jersey. There IS a Jazz station in Massachusetts, WICN . There may be more stations playing Jazz in Massachusetts that nobody has included yet (do we count WGBH, WOMR, WUMD, et al., which play Jazz part-time?). But, the navigational purpose is thus: clicking on Jazz Stations in Ma. takes you to that template; there IS a Jazz station in Massachusetts: WICN. Navigation, using the template, has worked. Also, stations do flip formats, so who's to say there won't be another station flipping to Jazz in the future? Now, getting rid of this template would reduce clicking on Jazz from any other Ma. radio template to redirecting to the generic Jazz music article, which isn't what clicking on the template is supposed to do. If anything, it would be better to have no link than a link to an article that isn't what the link is supposed to connect to.Stereorock (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jazz Radio Stations in New Jersey

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one entry Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Having this provides a broader overview of formats available in New Jersey. Secondly, stations change formats all the time & they may flip to Jazz. Thirdly, there may be other stations broadcasting Jazz in New Jersey that we don't know about, which will be added when we find that information out.Stereorock (talk) 12:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AddendumThere is nothing in WP:TCSD which warrants the deletion of this template.Stereorock (talk) 21:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer:Sure there's a navigational purpose: in each of the (Radio Format) in New Jersey page that has a template, there is a link to all available templates, including Jazz stations in New Jersey. There IS a Jazz station in New Jersey, WBGO (& if you count WBGO's HD2 stream as separate, that makes 2 stations). There may be more stations playing Jazz in New Jersey that nobody has included yet. But, the navigational purpose is thus: clicking on Jazz Stations in N.J. takes you to that template; there IS a Jazz station in New Jersey: WBGO. Navigation, using the template, has worked. Also, stations do flip formats, so who's to say there won't be another station flipping to Jazz in the future? Now, getting rid of this template would reduce clicking on Jazz from any other N.J. radio template to redirecting to the generic Jazz music article, which isn't what clicking on the template is supposed to do. If anything, it would be better to have no link than a link to an article that isn't what the link is supposed to connect to.Stereorock (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mainstream Rock Radio Stations in Rhode Island

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer:Actually, it DOES. When you click on each of the available formats in Rhode Island, they either go TO one of these templates of stations (which is useful) or to the musical genre itself when there are no stations (not useful). If I ask myself "is there a Mainstream Rock station in Rhode Island?", I can click on the any of the (Radio Format) in Rhode Island templates, & find Mainstream Rock down at the bottom. Another factor: stations change formats; who's to say that there may not be 2 Mainstream Rock stations in Rhode Island in the future? Rhode Island, due to its small size, only has a limited number of available frequencies (unlike, say, California, where there very well may be 30 Mainstream Rockers/A.O.R.s in the whole state), but currently, WHJY is a Mainstream Rocker/A.O.R. station & it can be gotten to by using this template. The template is valid. If there were no stations in a given format, you may have a point, but seeing how there is, and we cannot predict if other stations will or won't flip formats (something stations quite often do), it makes sense to keep this template.Stereorock (talk) 01:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cymru Alliance teamlist

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this template is no longer needed - superceded by Template:Cymru Alliance ⇒ Chris0282 (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cymru Alliance seasons

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this template is no longer needed - superceded by Template:Cymru Alliance ⇒ Chris0282 (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-MUTCD

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 09:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-USGov-Interior-BLM

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 09:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_2&oldid=791304245"