Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 26

< June 25	June 27 >

June 26

County cricket templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:English first-class cricket clubs in 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Gloucestershire County Cricket Club by season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete both. Redundant and add no value. Second one has not been maintained for ten years. Jack | ^{talk page} 13:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete {{English first-class cricket clubs in 2005}} and replace with {{2005 English cricket season}} where needed. delete {{Gloucestershire County Cricket Club by season}} since it only connects a few articles. Frietjes (talk) 16:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Toomanyflags

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 July 4. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toomanyflags (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taskforce-ping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taskforce-ping (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ as used [1]. – Uanfala 11:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Well then, delete per below. – Uanfala 20:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the link provided by Uanfala clearly demonstrates that it hasn't been used in about 10 years (last used on 23 July 2007). and yes, I did inspect all 20 uses in the search link ((1) User talk:Jekoko/Desk, (2) User talk:Shadowoflinux, (3) User talk:SodiumChloride, (4) User talk:Evilshoebox, (5) User talk:Junkyardprince, (6) User talk:Averykrouse, (7) User talk:Vyzasatya, (8) User talk:Bibliomaniac15/Archive 1, (9) User talk:C i d, (10) User talk:Kaal/archive1, (11) User talk:Ben Babcock, (12) User talk:Android79/TalkArchive006, (13) User talk:Craigy144/Archive 2, (14) User talk:Linuxbeak/Archive2, (15) User talk:Craigy144/Archive 3, (16) User talk:Haza-w/Archive5, (17) User talk:Trevor MacInnis/Archive 01, (18) User talk:MacGyverMagic/Archive 22, (19) User talk:Elric of Grans, (20) User talk:Linuxbeak/Archive8). Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wow, I have no memory of creating this template, but apparently I did. The Cleanup Taskforce is no longer active, so it's no longer needed. -- Beland (talk) 18:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chadhar Sub Clans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chadhar Sub Clans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The main article has been deleted. There's only three blue links left, one of which is actually unrelated. The other two are up for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines parliamentary election, 2005

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines parliamentary election, 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the results table is already in Vincentian general election, 2005. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).