Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 18

September 18

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template full of redlinks Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template full of redlinks. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A navigational template that only directs to redlinks that are unlikely to exist. Yosemiter (talk) 15:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and redirect to preserve attribution. Primefac (talk) 00:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in only one article, the active editing spree has calmed down, so we should merge it with the article (preserving history behind an article-space redirect) as a "single-use" template. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Eurovision Song Contest 2009. Other template is not in use (almost anywhere) so I'll do a cursory review and redirect. Primefac (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Eurovision Song Contest 2009 with Template:ESC 2009.
Not sure which one is correct, but they are clearly the same template with different names. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, replaceable by {{Cc-by-sa-3.0|dw=yes}} FASTILY 02:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).