Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 13

< January 12	January 14 >

January 13

Template:Harrisburg City Islanders squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Harrisburg City Islanders squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

duplicate of Template:Penn FC squad Joeykai (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redirect or Delete~~ Not sure whether unused or not. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The title is not standard. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unused and not needed. Giant Snowman 13:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no potential. Lorstaking (talk) 03:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no need for the duplicate template using the team's old name. Jay eyem (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wilmington Hammerheads FC squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wilmington Hammerheads FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and out-of-date template for a defunct team. Unnecessary to maintain template for semi-pro sides. Jay eyem (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, no need to exist for a defunct team. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unused and not needed. Giant Snowman 12:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bandini Automobili

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion, and the redirects linked have been reverted to articles. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bandini Automobili (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Malformed, all content redirected Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 08:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @TenPoundHammer: I checked some of the links. Four of them link to the article they are supposed to....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until consensus is reached in related discussion at WikiProject Automobiles. The linked articles were redirected because TenPoundHammer recently went through and deleted all of the content. –dlthewave ☎ 13:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. {Multiple articles were redirected without discussion). Eagleash (talk) 13:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per above. Redirecting template linked articles then using 'content redirected' as a reason for deletion is worthy of trouting....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).