Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< July 2 July 4 >

July 3

edit

Template:HTML element

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac (talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not clearly explained how to use it. —SamB (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OldcsdRescued

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used, (one 1 talk page, by its creator) and I believe it has several flaws.

  1. Any experienced admin has seen someone “rescue” a deleted article, only to make a new article that still shouldn’t be here
  2. Seems to suggest a policy that does not exist, that an article can’t be deleted twice under the same criterion if someone plants their flag on it and says “look at me, I rescued this”
  3. ”Names and shames” deleting admin. Not that they’ve done anything to be ashamed of, but I’ve never seen that in such a template before and it seems overly personal and vindictive.

In short, this seems to have been created to claim victory in the great battle over notability rather than serving a legitimate, policy based purpose. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ron Kenoly

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There were six links other than the subject's article. The five albums were redirected as non-notable and the other entry doesn't mention the subject. No navigation required. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Stagecoach Eastbourne bus routes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. Non notable bus routes (and unlikely to ever be). Ajf773 (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Buses route layout

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in any articles, redundant and we don't generally list every stop for bus routes. Ajf773 (talk) 09:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Greatest Hits (Westlife album) tracks

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need nor precedent to have a track listing for every album a song appears on within the infobox of the articles of those songs. Just think if someone tried to do this for songs by the Who or the Beach Boys.

There can be some justification for such templates for the original album but it is excessive to include compilations. Such navigation is better provided by {{Westlife singles}}. Someone interested in the tracklisting can just go to those album pages rather than clutter up infoboxes with multiple templates such as these. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_3&oldid=849890565"