Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 November 12

< November 11	November 13 >

November 12

Template:Tlttu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The keep arguments did not address how this template was not redundant to other templates. This template is unused and the delete arguments addressed how this template is redundant. Therefore, I am closing this as delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlttu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant template. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion It's unused because it's new, give it sometime. And how is it redundant? Sure it similar to other templates, but no redundant. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 23:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment BrandonXLF was given a 1 month ban in part for creating this very template. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep How is it redundant? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 07:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant. If this mouseover tooltip feature is wanted, it can be added as parameter to other, broadly used templates in the {{tl}} family. We don't need a stand-alone template for one micro-tweak like that. I also see some additional potential nominees in this template's /doc#See_also section. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SMcCandlish, also tooltips should die per MOS:ACCESS (except when using <abbr>...</abbr>). There's also no visual indication that there is a tooltip. Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Mediation Committee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Basic maintenance work. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG^converse 11:18, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Mediation Committee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per RGloucester at Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Mediation Committee ([1]) ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 20:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can't these just be speedily deleted? — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I intended to tag them for speedy deletion, but they are protected, so I could not. Not sure why they're here... RGloucester — ☎ 19:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warning archive notice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 20. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 02:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warning_archive_notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:H. P. Lovecraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 20. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:H._P._Lovecraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Works_of_H._P._Lovecraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cthulhu_Mythos (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Founders of Kappa Alpha Psi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Founders of Kappa Alpha Psi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that does not appear on any article and that has no links on it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The pages on which this was used were all deleted, without notifying the creator (me) or other content contributors. I haven't had the time to address this issue, but nevertheless, it is indeed the case that this template is no longer used. If the goal is to keep the template library as lean as possible, then it should be deleted. It is easy enough to create a new one should the time come. WDavis1911 (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a single link....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete or userify or speedy delete as G2 maybe a test template Hhkohh (talk) 09:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete, this version shows it was created to link articles, but those articles do not exist. Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).