Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 31

October 31

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 8. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after being merged with the article. Frietjes (talk) 12:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cathedrals of the Catholic Church in the United Kingdom and Ireland with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales, Template:Cathedrals of the Catholic Church in Ireland, and Template:Catholic seminaries in Scotland (rebuilt).
Much overlapping, and much related. May as well be merged for better overview. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Sorry, this doesn't make any sense. Merging cathedrals in the UK and Ireland seems logical, but then add bishops on top of that, and then add the Scottish seminaries? - most of which no longer exist. This is absurd. Did you look at the the Scottish seminaries template before nominating it for merger? There's no overlap whatsoever; no mention of bishops or cathedrals. Pjposullivan (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I realised that the scope was a bit confusing after proposing it. However, wouldn't these templates merit an overview and restructering still? Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, please explain why Scottish seminaries needs restructuring, by placing them into templates about UK cathedrals and bishops? Pjposullivan (talk) 09:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Merging this lot would just create an unwidely monster navbox. The reader is better erved by keeping them separate. However, they could perhaps be linked to each other. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Catholic dioceses in England and Wales with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales.
See below. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The diocesan template is much easier to use when navigating between dioceses. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Every diocese has at least 4 associated articles with it: the diocese itself, the list of its bishops, the current bishop and its cathedral - and that's not to mention all of its churches, schools, colleges, shrines, communities etc. As per above, the original nomination was for all of this to be put onto one template, making it very difficult to navigate. After all Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and such a bloated template would generalise and overly simplify, not explain the complexity of the world. Pjposullivan (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Template:Chaplaincies of the Catholic Church in England and Wales and keep Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Chaplaincies of the Catholic Church in England and Wales with Template:Catholic Bishops and Archbishops in England and Wales.
See below. Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, Delete the Chaplaincies template, just get rid of it. The exarchate no longer exists, of all the airport chaplaincies only Heathrow's has its own article, it's interdenominational and mentions the Catholic Church only a couple of times, leaving only the Bishopric of the Forces which features in all the other templates anyway. Pjposullivan (talk) 08:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the Chaplaincies template. Do not merge, just delete. It's mostly redlinks, and the rst woukd add little value to the bishops navbox. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 8. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:14, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category header navbox, redundant to the new generic {{Fooers at the YYYY Winter Olympics category}}, which uses {{Winter Olympics by year category navigation}} BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).