Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 4

October 4

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 12. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 02:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to Template:3RoundBracket-Byes with different labels for RD1, RD2, and RD3. Frietjes (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template with just two links related to team. Either to the team article or its stadium. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

was being used on only one page, 2011 Conference USA Baseball Tournament, where I replaced it, so it's no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 17:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. No rationale has been provided and no other editors have provided any input. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Polish Second Level seasons with Template:Polish First League.
Technical listing of misformatted TFD started by another user. I have no opinion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary wrapper for {{Infobox country}}. Only used in, and can only ever be used in, two articles. The lines it adds can easily be added within the articles. Undocumented so makes it much harder for any editor editing either article to make changes to the infobox. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 07:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Content has been merged to 2018–19 Syrian Premier League and template deleted. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused, same content as 2018–19 Syrian Premier League#Standings See my comment below (not withdraw) Hhkohh (talk) 14:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hhkohh: Keep I'm in the process of putting every 2019 top-division league standings into a template for consistency, so would rather keep this. Chanheigeorge (talk) 02:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Before I nominated this template, this template is substed by Ammarof. I do not know why he subst it. But the template is readded now. @Ammarof: Can you explain why you substed it? @Chanheigeorge: I know what you are doing, but we seldom create standings templates when we only use in a single article. I do not oppose you putting every 2019 top-division league standings into a template because some club season (and maybe 2018 in Syrian football may use this kind of templates Hhkohh (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I readded the template. Again as I said, it is for consistency across all league articles. Also easier (at least for me) to keep track of standings updates. Chanheigeorge (talk) 10:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).