Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 9

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< September 8 September 10 >

September 9

edit

West Virginia TV network affiliation templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 17. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Shinto shrine

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 17. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Medieval Scottish Diocese

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 20. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Episcopal succession

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ordination. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:49, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Episcopal succession with Template:Ordination.
Already merged, it seems, not sure why it is then still existing. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose no one has done the actual work of merging, which is harder than proposing a merge. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC).[reply]
@Rich Farmbrough: On the contrary, I largely merged Episcopal succession into Ordination some time ago. There are only a few remaining articles that use the former template, which need to be manually converted to use Ordination before the old template should be deleted. If you want to go ahead an manually replace with the new template, go ahead. Ergo Sum 04:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support: To clarify my position, this merger has all but been done already. The only real step that remains is to delete Template:Episcopal succession. Ergo Sum 01:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Merging episcopal succession with ordination is a good idea since the two are almost the same (therefore redundant) save for the fact that ordination requires the listing of a denomination which could easily be transferred to a singular template. Additionally, the overall template can usually be embedded into infoboxes anyway which is an optional thing based on user discretion. In other words, I'd say the merge is OK. Lord Sidious 82 (talk) 14:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US Dax squad

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox is for a French rugby union team, but now have a vast majority of red links (with just 4 blue links at present), and as US Dax squad no longer participate in a fully professional rugby union competition, current or new players won't automatically be deemed notable as per WikiProject Rugby union/Notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI : a 5th ″blue″ link could be added (Simon Labouyrie, ref : [1]), but I didn't update the template as the full squad won't be formalized by the club until next Monday (but he's playing tonight friendly match [2]).
By the way, various ″red″ links could be notable following the criteria : mostly Pablo Huete (10 caps with Chili, 6 seasons in French professional leagues, including 1 in D1), Bastien Berenguel (2 full seasons playing the World Sevens Series with France NT), or also Régis Rameau (13 seasons in in French professional leagues, including 2 in D1) and Olivier August (11 seasons in in French professional leagues, including 2 in D1).
If deleted, do not forget to propose Template:SC Albi squad that didn't played at professional level since 2016-17 season.
- Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nomination. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 19:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Map of Countries of the United Kingdom

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete , but I am happy to restore it if someone has a use for it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BASKETBALL CHAMPIONS LEAGUE PLAYER STATISTICS LEGEND

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Severan2

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 18. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_9&oldid=860420927"