Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 7

August 7

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Component/dependant of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Trauma and orthopaedics kingboyk (talk) 22:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Redundant since Portal:Trauma and orthopaedics was deleted in May 2019 per WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Trauma and orthopaedics. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:51, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Nearly identical content appears at New York City Subway stations#Stations with the same name. The content is a simple table and is unlikely to be used on any other pages so a template is not necessary. BLAIXX 10:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of four links: the band's article, a member's article, a member redirected back to the band and an album redirected back to the band. With only two links that already navigate to each other, there are no notable releases, so there are not enough links to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 04:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of four links: the band's article, a member of the band's article, an album that redirects back to the band and the label they were signed to that should not be in the template. With only two links that already navigate to each other, there are no notable releases, there are not enough links to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).