Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Node page (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Transcludes many nonexistent templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Category manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Category manager (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the module author: weak keep; I simply haven't implemented use of it anywhere and have been fairly inactive lately. If it weren't a module and thus a special content type, I'd suggest that userfying would be a reasonable outcome. As an admin, I can always undelete it later if need be, hence "weak" in "weak keep". {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 20:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Module:Sandbox/Nihiltres/Category manager would be the "userfying" of this. --Gonnym (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notability progress/Part1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notability progress/Part1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:CFB schedule/convert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:CFB schedule/convert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template merger that was performed using this module finished ages ago. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semipjim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semipjim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. We have edit notices and page protection notices for things like this. Maybe this should have been created in the editor's user space? Recommend move to user subpage if this is for personal use only. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved to user space and deleted the template, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AnotherReflist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AnotherReflist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't bother me and templates which I had made. Or please explain why you should delete templates which other people made and which did not disturb your pen. --UikiHedeo (talk) 11:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@UikiHedeo: You do not own this template, nobody owns anything on Wikipedia, so the template is not yours. The nominator already explained why the template should be deleted. -- /Alex/₂₁ 12:08, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused and redundant. There is no reason to use this reflist over the normal one and consistency is desirable. No problem with userfying if UikiHedeo wants it though. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alvarezsauroidea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Evaluated as WP:T3 due to no participation. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alvarezsauroidea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template - redundant to the use of {{Theropoda|B.}} Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Add infobox time zone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Add infobox time zone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as creator.– BrandonXLF (talk) 16:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Crown (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 January 8. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The_Crown_(TV_series) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).