Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< February 14 February 16 >

February 15

edit

Template:RussiaTimeZone

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template documentation says it should be used by {{Infobox Russian federal subject}}, {{Infobox Russian district}} and {{Infobox Russian inhabited locality}} but these don't use it. It is not used by any other template or page. Gonnym (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Find sources template pages

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 27. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 12:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metadata population AT-9

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 12:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Horrendous way to maintain population data across multiple pages. This used to be used by Template:Infobox Vienna District which has been deleted via this TFD. As part of that conversion process, the use of this template was removed. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quarterbacks coaches of the Big 12 Conference

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:Navbox guidelines 2, The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article, for instance nobody cares that Lincoln Riley also is the OU QB Coach 4, There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template as there will likely never be a list of Big XII football coaches and and 5, If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles. Furthermore, a person does not meet GNG for being a QB coach at an NCAA school therefore, it is also not a defining aspect of the members of the navbox. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Lua

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Wikipedia talk:Lua used primarily to discuss general programming issues with Lua rather than the page Wikipedia:Lua itself, the editnotice serves no useful purpose. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw5

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template intends to be a level-5 warning template for users who have vandalized past a level-4 warning, informing the vandal that they have been reported to administrators. I claim that this template is unnecessary. In such an event, the block message (like {{uw-block}}) that the administrator would eventually leave (if the report was properly submitted) serves as the "level 5". Repeatedly sending warnings may actually be counterproductive for chronic or extremely persistent vandals: see WP:DENY and WP:RBI. Mz7 (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per DENY as in nomination. Telling a vandal-only-account "You have been reported to the administrators" will just confirm their opinion that Wikipedia deserves vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 07:12, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Costliest U.S. Atlantic hurricanes by wealth normalization

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 22. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_15&oldid=886204502"