Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 17

January 17

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:23, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links to only 3 articles, transcluded in only 1 article, and redundant navigation with existence of {{Selena songs}}. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Appears in the infobox of Enamorada de Ti (song) and nowhere else. The style for other Selena song infoboxes is different, so this seems out of line. Rather strangely in {{Selena songs}} the song does not appear in the song list next to Ven Conmigo (album) but under "other songs" (but that's different issue). Nigej (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Last.fm groups will no longer be accessible. Guilherme Burn (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition, reasonable arguments. Primefac (talk) 04:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is no longer a candidate. The template serves no purpose that can't be met through routine editing and talk page discussion. It is distracting and takes up space on the edit interface, with no benefit. - MrX 🖋 12:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 January 30. Primefac (talk) 03:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).