Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< July 19 July 21 >

July 20

edit

Template:Psychiatric Metaphors

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This musician's navigational template consists of three links: the musician's article, an album article and an EP article. Since the musician's articles and the two already navigate to each other, there are not enough articles to justify having this navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The New Trocaderos

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of five links: the band's article, two member articles and two related band articles that should not be included. The band and member articles already navigate to each other and with no notable albums or singles, three articles is not enough to justify having a navigational template and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wage War

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation if and when more links are available, as this was the primary reason for deletion. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Musician navboxes are meant to link together at least four related pages. Only three other notable links are present and none of the other entries listed can be linked. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: in fact the third bluelinked album redirects to the band's article, because it won't be released for another month yet. So only two linked pages at present, and it will probably be another two years before a fourth link becomes available. Richard3120 (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015–16 Israeli Premier League Championship Round table

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:15, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 14:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

MNRR s-line templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} templates for the Metro-North Railroad. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Metro-North Railroad. All transclusions replaced. There are eight dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Goalscorers

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Neha Kakkar

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template that has no links at all and just one transclusion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney submarine attractions

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 28. Primefac (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox high court

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox court. Reasonable nomination, no opposition. Might be easier to merge into {{Infobox high court}} and do a pageswap. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox high court with Template:Infobox court.
Templates are virtually identical (diff), and their differences are unrelated to the "high court" distinction, namely:

  • {{Infobox court}} has additional parameter |appealsfrom= (i.e. the court from which this court hears appeals), and additional params for an optional 3rd chief judge, and a division map
  • {{Infobox court}} uses parameter names |appealsto= and |jurisdiction= where {{Infobox high court}} uses the names |appeals= and |country=, respectively.

High court has ~375 transclusions whereas court has only ~95, but we should merge to {{Infobox court}} because it has a more generic name (and its params are a superset of high court's). The high court infobox is not even used consistently as intended for "the highest court in a state or country" (see e.g. Ohio Court of Claims). Brought this up informally at Template talk:Infobox high court a few months back, but got no takers. Colin M (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support @Colin M: with the provision that supporting documentation for |appealsto= in {{infobox court}} is mandatory; and where it is the highest court in the country/jurisdiction, must be completed with Nil, or similar descriptor, such as Pardon by the President/Governor/parliament/etc. Why we're here, is there any reason why {{infobox U.S. federal court}} should be maintained? Rangasyd (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 TVB

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 28. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup hosts squads

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list for players of WC hosting nations. A bit too trivial for anyone to actually search it. Daiyusha (talk) 02:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_20&oldid=908293797"