Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 14
June 14
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Unnecessary. We don't need these sidebars for every politician, only the most significant ones who actually do have a *series* of articles *about* them, not just vaguely related ones. Doesn't help the reader as the all articles linked are already linked prominently in the Scott Morrison article. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As creator, I obviously thought there was a purpose, despite not finding many relevant articles yet besides ministries and elections. Six of the previous seven prime ministers of Australia have similar sidebars in Category:Australia political leader sidebars. --Scott Davis Talk 10:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- delete, only used in two articles which are already well-connected in the prose. Frietjes (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- It had been removed from the second ministry page as the royal commission titles forced the box too wide. I've shortened them and put it back on that page and the Morrison Government page. That's four pages in total at present. Should it be on any of the other pages it links to (election, royal commissions, electorate) or other pages I haven't thought to link? Or is it wasted effort to try to improve it now there are two delete !votes? --Scott Davis Talk 05:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- better to use a navbox, since navboxes don't crowd the contents at the top of the article. but, the navigation between ministry articles is already covered by Template:First Morrison Ministry, ... Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- It had been removed from the second ministry page as the royal commission titles forced the box too wide. I've shortened them and put it back on that page and the Morrison Government page. That's four pages in total at present. Should it be on any of the other pages it links to (election, royal commissions, electorate) or other pages I haven't thought to link? Or is it wasted effort to try to improve it now there are two delete !votes? --Scott Davis Talk 05:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As creator said. Techie3 (talk) 04:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep serves purpose well. Also, in future it will only grow. So better keep it now. Störm (talk) 23:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 21. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:46, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Category_4_Australian_region_severe_tropical_cyclones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 21. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:46, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Category_3_Australian_region_severe_tropical_cyclones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 21. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:46, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Category_2_Australian_region_tropical_cyclones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).