Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WNBA team seasons navboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are redundant to the teams' primary navboxes, which also list every season (i.e. {{Connecticut Sun}}, {{Houston Comets}}, {{Phoenix Mercury}}, {{Seattle Storm}}) and are actually included on all the seasons, unlike the nominated season-specific navboxes. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WNBA inaugural seasons

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are fancruft and banner-hanging. Being an inaugural season does not entail extra clutter at the base of an article. If anyone wants to see who was on the roster of the teams' inaugural seasons, they can go to the teams' season articles. Also, being a first season in team history is not defining, by navbox standards. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).