Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 23

< October 22	October 24 >

October 23

Template:Bolivia squad 2018 Copa América Femenina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bolivia_squad_2018_Copa_América_Femenina (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lucy Hale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lucy Hale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, only 3 articles with one being a redirect Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Links to other articles have been added but now it violates WP:PERFNAV. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:American Juniors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:American_Juniors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Cite Q/testcases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:REFUND applies in case the creator wish to retrive their tests. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 22:05, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Cite Q/testcases (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Does not appear to be an actual working attempt at creating test cases for the module Module:Cite Q, which doesn't need test cases anyway as all it does is implement a template. I couldn't figure out how to get a tfd tag to show, so have not added one. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:16, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPUnited States Article alerts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPUnited States Article alerts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This was part of a WikiProject's page formatting, and should not be in the Template namespace. I have now bypassed it with this edit. No other current pages link to it.

Note: The reason for my interest in the page is that I frequently check backlinks to deleted pages. Most entries in "what links here" are pages of article alerts. My eye is used to passing over Wikiprojects alerts pages, but I have to check anything in Template namespace (among others). There are not many others like this one. (I admit that my requirement could be met simply by blanking the page rather than deleting it.) – Fayenatic London 13:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Introductory articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was rename. Feel free to start a new discussion if you still feel it should be deleted Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Introductory articles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per the policies on navigation templates (WP:NAVBOX, WP:NAV), navboxes are for topically relevant articles, relating to a subject. It's hard to imagine that a reader of Introduction to general relativity would want to be led to Introduction to cooperative learning. --Yair rand (talk) 11:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but remove Introduction to cooperative learning. Its not hard to imagine someone navigates from one introductory article about science to another one. Christian75 (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Christian75. Störm (talk) 05:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to {{introductory science articles}}. As Christian said, the connection stems from the fact that all these articles are about sciences which should be reflected in the template name. --Trialpears (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AS Progresul București seasons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AS Progresul București seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox which has only red links. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 09:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL clubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template and the clubs are already displayed at Template:Australian Football League. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (merge missing entries) - duplicate template. Make sure that there aren't any missing links as maybe the former teams section is missing. --Gonnym (talk) 10:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).