Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 6

< October 5	October 7 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cebu City Council (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox for a not inherently notable political position whose incumbents mostly don't have articles to link. We do not accept most city councillors as "inherently" notable, and Cebu is not in the very small and narrow class of major global cities that qualify for special treatment, so 17 of the 21 people here are non-notable redlinks -- and even of the just four people who do have articles, one's up for deletion. Only three of these people have articles that actually contain article-clinching notability claims, and a navbox is not necessary to link just three people. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, better to link through the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tucker Beathard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 18. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tucker_Beathard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Great Backlog Drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Great Backlog Drive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused WikiProject banner for the 2011 The Great Backlog Drive. No likleyhood of ever being used and should thus be deleted. --Trialpears (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence of use. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Merge Copied

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 18. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject_Merge_Copied (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:WikiProject_Merge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International cricket centuries by year

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:International cricket centuries by year (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

navbox for a set of articles all deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of International cricket centuries in 2019. Related category has been CSDed too. Spike 'em (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this Navbox now contains zero links. BLAIXX 13:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Biblioteca Marciana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Biblioteca Marciana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use infobox template, should be merged with the article Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to regular infobox (or not). Johnbod (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod, I tries here, but instead we got this. I was told that there using standard infoboxes is not acceptable for this unique building. Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox has been moved to the article page. Template can be deleted.Venicescapes (talk) 10:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Graph:Most Expensive Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 15:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Graph:Most Expensive Books (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Consensus is against use in the single article it was previously used in: Talk:List of most expensive books and manuscripts#Interactive graph. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It duplicates most of the data in List of most expensive books and manuscripts so is very difficult to maintain, and consensus is that the graph does not add value for users. BabelStone (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is exactly why single-use templates shouldn't exist. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).