Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 7

< September 6	September 8 >

September 7

Chem templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chem A-Class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chem B-Class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chem FA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chem GA-Class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chem Start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Chem Stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete assessment templates specific to WikiProject Chemistry and WikiProject Chemicals. Essentially redundant to the standard {{-Class}} series of templates, however their only usage is in a few historical (10 year old +) tables (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Worklist, TfD tags are breaking their usage but you get the idea) so I suggest subst & delete. PC78 (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found no usage in mainspace. No documentation. And no need. (I work with {{Chembox}} a lot, never even met one). -DePiep (talk) 19:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete use does seem pointless and easily replaceable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gymnastics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gymnastics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is only used in one location. I have merged the content of the template into the article it was being used in Gymnastics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification. This renders this template unnecessary, which is why I am nominating it for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no longer needed after being substituted in Gymnastics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Summary. Frietjes (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Louisville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Louisville (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Effectively redundant; support for this WikiProject was added to {{WikiProject United States}} back in 2011 and only 16 uses of {{WikiProject Louisville}} remain. Since there is nothing to actually merge I suggest removing or replacing those last few uses. PC78 (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to a better template. BLAIXX 12:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ali Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 16. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ali_Jones (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Election templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge into the articles that transclude them. If and when these tables are needed on other articles, they can be transcluded directly from the article. Primefac (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1993/qc-mn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian federal election, 1988/qc-me (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One has 1 transclusion each, should be substituted DannyS712 (talk) 04:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep these. I am sure eventually they will be included in an article on those elections. -- Earl Andrew - talk 14:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; templates should be kept or deleted based on their present use, not what might happen in the future. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Merge with article and delete. --Trialpears (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete after merging with attribution, we should be able to use LST to share content between articles. I would support seeing all of these deleted after being merged/converted to LST for content sharing. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bug

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 16. Primefac (talk) 01:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bug (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bugzilla (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chetan kamble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G2 (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chetan kamble (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Autobiographical "template" that serves no apparent purpose but promotion. Geolodus (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).