Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 9

September 9

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 18. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Historical warning reffering to a now non-exsistent feature. --Trialpears (talk) 20:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template for historical process. --Trialpears (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Old XfD multi. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Old AfD with Template:Old XfD multi.
Kept separate from the now main template {{Old XfD multi}} due to some ancient history. Wrapper should be made substitutable and then migrated to the main template. --Trialpears (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded table showing team statistics with all values fixed at 0. Not used in any article with only transclusion on creators user page. Completly non-functional. --Trialpears (talk) 20:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Redirect. I made this template back in February when I was just getting used to doing stuff on Wikipedia. I really didn't know what I was doing, and this was a glorified sandbox template for me for a day. I'll be nominating the subpages for deletion under WP:CSD#G7.
@Trialpears: Since this is pretty much a speedy close, you're still free to nominate the redirect for RFD if you so choose. (non-admin closure)MJLTalk 20:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template for indicating "wrong" talk quotes. I do see no use case for this template where {{!xt}} for bad examples wouldn't be more appropriate. Only one page using it which should be replaced with {{!xt}}. It also seems to be broken. --Trialpears (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Used to add the ellipses character (which is discouraged by the MOS) to one article. --Trialpears (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Template:WikiProject Kollam. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:WikiProject Kollam into Template:WikiProject India.
WikiProject Kollam is essentially just a small (and inactive) subproject of WikiProject India. There are only 53 transclusions of this banner so it would make more sense, and help reduce talk page clutter and redundancy, to handle it as a parameter in {{WikiProject India}}. The necessary changes have been sandboxed at {{WikiProject India/sandbox}}, with testcases at Template:WikiProject India/testcases. PC78 (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

does nothing Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 22. Primefac (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).