Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 8

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 7 October 9 >

October 8

edit

Template:Repr3

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Can be userfied at creator's request. Primefac (talk) 00:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template produces hard-coded 12 chars ("Repr. Cat. 3") and does nothing else. Used on exactly one page, creator's sandbox, not edited since 2016 — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Golden Child

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Group has an article for one album. Provides no navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WEi

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:G7 TheSandDoctor Talk 00:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No directly related articles for this to be a worthwhile navigational tool for the band. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Marques zarzuelas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jommelli operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Traetta operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on five articles. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thomson operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taylor operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vaccai operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single use; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the article when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vinci operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stewart Wallace operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Le Sueur operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Landi operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lalo operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on two articles; fails WP:NENAN. Redundant to {{Édouard Lalo}}. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Useless since there's only two articles Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Redundant to {{Édouard Lalo}}, a more complete navbox already placed at the foot of the page, the preferred location for them + the image in the sidebar is rendered invisible on the mobile platform. There are much more apt and illustrative images available for these operas, either as stand-alones or in an infobox, both of which can be seen by all readers. Incididentally, there are three articles on Lalo's operas, but unlike {{Édouard Lalo}}, this sidebar has not been updated since 2011 and shows only two. Voceditenore (talk) 08:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roussel operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on three articles; fails WP:NENAN. Hides the image on mobile (the image should be retained in the articles when the template is removed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete redundant and a bad excuse to not have individual images for each opera. Useless since there's only three articles Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Redundant to {{Albert Roussel}} (footer navbox) which I've just created and placed in the articles. It's the preferred position for navboxes and its more complete with links to Roussel's ballets and instrumental music as well. Plus, the composer's image in the sidebar is rendered invisible to readers on the mobile platform.
  • delete, better to use the footer for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fall operas

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; fails WP:NENAN. Redundant to {{Leo Fall}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LIRR Far Rockaway platform layout

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per consensus at listed discussion, and no opposition here. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus over at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains/Archive:_2019#RfC_about_station_layouts_and_exits was to not include station/platform layouts, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AwardsYearHeader

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems to be a relic of earlier phases in the development of category header templates. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:28, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unnecessary taxonomy templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of the 207 templates at Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates per Wikipedia_talk:Automated_taxobox_system/Archive_2#How_to_delete_taxonomy_that_is_no_longer_valid?. See previous TfDs at here and here.[reply]

Not going to tag the others as this is purely technical nomination as both the category and the established precedents are to delete these. Gonnym (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Being worked on

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just 56 transclusions - a few in archives, the majority of the remainder simply documenting its existence. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. By its nature this is a temporary template for responding to edit requests while work is done and then to be replaced when afterwards. As such of course the trans liaison list is going to be low. That means it's doing its job properly. oknazevad (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Oknazevad. {{Being worked on}} is only meant to be transcluded while the thing being worked on is in the process of being worked on, and when it's no longer being worked on, the template will normally be replaced with another one, like {{resolved}}. – Uanfala (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suppressed

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 17. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

AFL scorecard templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I have substituted these (see these edits) but please feel free to replace them with another template. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates, which all only have a few transclusions, are redundant to Template:AFLGameDetailed, which has a cleaner design but, more importantly, is the most widely used match template. (Not sure if this means they should be merged or deleted, though; if a TfD regular could give an opinion on which option is best that would be great). – Teratix ₵ 11:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

User:Makoy Canlas/I Can See Your Voice editing instructions

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since the user has used this a template I'm nominating it as such. This is a horrible pseudo-manual-of-style for I Can See Your Voice articles which is placed on their talk pages. Besides my personal distaste for the color scheme, sections and general layout, this is not the place to put these, nor is there any consensus that their way is the way to do it. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:I Can See Your Voice (Chinese game show)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Single season show which last aired 4 years ago so no season planned. Navbox not really needed here. Gonnym (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FaxonRash

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only navigates two films ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Epic Rap Battles

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links for a separate navbox. -- /Alex/21 05:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Festivals by year pre1000 cat

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused template, and highly unlikely to be used. Currently Category:Festivals by year goes back only to the 1750s. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Citation/CS1/autofix

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. If someone really wants to userfy it, they can, but general consensus is to just delete it. Primefac (talk) 01:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Help talk:Citation Style 1#Is Module:Citation/CS1/autofix used by anything? * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user is blocked, not banned. I do not endorse that user's opinions/behaviour at all, but this piece of code was obviously a good faith contribution, therefore the current status of that user should not be relevant in the evaluation of the code. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Syria place

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 17. (non-admin closure) St3095 (?) 15:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_8&oldid=984014031"