Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 2. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and unnecessary as the articles these templates were created for use different tables for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following a merger of the individual ceremonies to American Film Institute Awards, all links point to a single page, making the navbox unnecessary. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use and should be substituted per the standard on other Kurdistan election articles after 1992. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All should be substituted on the respective Iraqi governorate election article since these are single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 2. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2009 is single-use and should be substituted per the standard on other Lebanon parliamentary election articles. 2005 is unused and unnecessary as the 2005 article uses a different table. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to the 2009 election article. Delete the 2005 one. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be substituted on the LSSP mainspace. No need for the party electoral record to be on a separate template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure what information can be gained from this as it doesn't specify what election this is for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A single-use template and should be substituted onto the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election article. Gonnym (talk) 08:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be substituted where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be substituted where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election articles. Gonnym (talk) 08:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that should be substituted where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election articles. Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 2. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very few of these articles are about the Kingpin, he's only a supporting role in most of them. ★Trekker (talk) 20:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2005, 2006, 2007, and 2011 are unused as the repsective election articles use different tables for the results. The 2019 template probably should be removed where it's used as it is irrlevant to the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All unused (the 2019 had different figures to the 2019 election article, so I replaced it with a transclusion of the article's table) and unnecessary. Number 57 22:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 2. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be substituted onto the 2009 election article since it's single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election article. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used and redundant to the different table used on 2003 parliamentary election article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates that should be substituted onto the respective articles it was created for. The 2017 template is used on three wrong articles outside the 2017 election mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election articles. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Should be substituted onto the 2019 Indonesian provincial legislative election article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

HAVAG templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{s-line}} templates for bus and tram lines operated by Hallesche Verkehrs-AG [de]; replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Trams in Halle (Saale) for the tram line color output, which is the only thing needed. All transclusions removed/replaced. There are 24 dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).