Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used to transclude a list of requests from the Wikipedia Requests service. That no longer works making this template completly useless. The 17 current uses should be removed as appropriate and then this template deleted. --Trialpears (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yahoo maps is dead since 2015. Currently this template result in a cn tag, but it's misplaced since it's inside a citation giving the appearance there is a proper citation. My proposed course of action would be conversion to {{Google maps}} (or {{Bing maps}} if you're so inclined) with manual verification of the claim. With only 49 transclusions this will be quite quick. --Trialpears (talk) 23:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 4. Primefac (talk) 01:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:ATP World Tour Masters 1000. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:ATP Masters Series tournaments with Template:ATP World Tour Masters 1000.
Overlapping templates. No need for two as they are basically the same tournaments. This one could also be deleted. I merged them in the history of the other template. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:ATP_World_Tour_Masters_1000&oldid=1023905375 ForzaUV (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:10, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ELNO #12, external links to open wikis are discouraged in most situations. The link currently in the template doesn't work, this is barely used, and the open wiki linked to does not appear to be widely used, significant, or active. I'm not sure why we'd keep a template that produces external links discouraged by ELNO. Hog Farm Talk 05:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ELNO #12, we generally shouldn't be externally linking to open wikis, unless they are significant and stable. This links to what appears to be an obscure, largely inactive wiki, and I'm not sure there's justification for having a template for this when the link itself is discouraged through ELNO. Only used twice in articlespace. Hog Farm Talk 05:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Now removed from all usage. --evrik (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    You really shouldn't do that; it improperly preempts the result of the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at the time I write this comment, the wiki has no edits at all in the last week, and only four people editing in the last 30 days. Clearly doesn't have [...] a substantial number of editors * Pppery * it has begun... 03:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used, and per WP:ELNO #12 we should only be externally linking to wikis that are those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. This does not really seem to be the case here, and this template is used nowhere in article space. Hog Farm Talk 05:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).