Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very outdated, and as such not a single player remains today. The team has been relegated and their current players don't have articles (see whatlinkshere). Thus there is no need for a navigational template.. 80.203.59.161 (talk) 08:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 18. plicit 04:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 04:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless. Not needed. ★Trekker (talk) 01:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 04:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless. Too few articles to be useful. ★Trekker (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 04:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless, only 4 articles here. ★Trekker (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Five. It passes the rule of five, WP:NENAN. Emerald Fennell, Promising Young Woman, Promising Young Woman (soundtrack), Promising Young Woman (score), and List of accolades received by Promising Young Woman. Vexedsmuggery (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The author's article is not something that should be used to support a template.★Trekker (talk) 03:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).