Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 24

2020–21 NWFL Premiership season

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was used one time, which I moved to the main article, also has a few redirects and a 1-item category. (N.B. should redirects be included in these listings, or are they taken care of automatically?) CRwikiCA talk 20:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CRwikiCA, you don't need to include the redirects, they are automatically deleted per WP:CSD#G8 if the templates are deleted. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed section transclusion in article and updated the link to the template which duplicated the article. The 2 categories will be empty after. CRwikiCA talk 19:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded this in the text per prior WT:FOOTY discussion, main contributor seems semi-retired. The 2 categories will be empty after. CRwikiCA talk 19:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only three articles, no need for a navigational box. ★Trekker (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

College softball class-/position-specific award navboxes

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Primary reasons are that these violate WP:CRUFT, WP:CREEP, and WP:NENAN. In NCAA Division I sports, Player of the Year and Coach of the Year are the only awards at the conference level that are major enough to warrant navboxes. There is now also a precedent for this type of discussion, with the unanimous outcome being delete (see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 16#Template:Big Ten Conference Women's Basketball Defensive Player of the Year navbox). SportsGuy789 (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2012 Summer Paralympics goalball templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 35 templates per event. Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note This makes Template:2012 Summer Paralympics goalball convenience template navbox redundant too and that should be added to this entry. CRwikiCA talk 18:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With the Winter Olympics curling convenience template deleted, this navbox doesn't serve much purpose. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).