Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, except in a discussion proposing its use at Module talk:Country population. It does not appear to work there for its intended purpose. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Contains special characters. plicit 03:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging these two templates into the more flexible and better-supported {{Contains special characters}}. As far as I can tell, adding the necessary links and options to the switch statements at the destination template should be straightforward, and I will be happy to help with it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
If you can merge without losing information, then go for it. Thanks. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with only two links. Subst and delete, or put an actual infobox of some kind into the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article and only two links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TG #8 "used on only one page". Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Table cell templates with obscure color names

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These unused templates define the background of a table cell using obscure color names. A reverse color lookup indicates that, for example, "moss" corresponds to teal, "redback" to red, "waterdeep" to Picton blue, "marinedeep" to True Blue, and "forest" to India green. Fernando Trebien (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2011; no substantive edits since then. Appears to have been replaced by some other page or process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 15. plicit 03:36, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).