Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 November 2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
This template seems to broad to be useful. We don't have a "famous people from Cleveland", do we. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – this is much more appropriate for a list/category than a navbox. I can only find one other similar template: {{People from Yadgir district}}. {{People from Colorado}} looks similar but is actually a navbox for lists of Coloradans. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete after merging with the article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Template:New Zealand Labour Party electoral history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused and no information can be displayed for use as it uses graphs and graphs are not working for the time. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Graphs are not coming back anytime soon. Gonnym (talk) 09:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Note this is not transcluded because it was commented out by GlowstoneUnknown. (findable via searching insource:"New Zealand Labour Party electoral history"; also can use WP:WikiBlame on New Zealand Labour Party)
Personally I think deleting templates solely on the basis of Graphs being indefinitely broken is somewhat counterproductive because it deletes the data that has been collated and organized; unless the graph contents are themselves objectionable, uploading new images that reproduce the graph contents would be better. (Of course: easier said than done, and I personally don't have the time to create an image right now.) Retro (talk | contribs) 18:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Subst first and then remove from the article if you want. Graphs aren't going to work as they did regardless, so the fact of the matter is that the data is useless here. Article histories (or talk pages) are cheap replacements. Izno (talk) 06:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 November 9. Izno (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Public_records_laws_in_the_United_States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.