Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 17
Only has 2 links. 1 of which is up for deletion. No value in having a navbox for 1-2 entries. LibStar (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
This may be a controversial decision, but I think this template should be split into multiple templates because according to WP:NAV-WITHIN, navigation templates should be kept small in size as a large template like this one has limited navigation value and is currently hard to read. The only problem is that some of those templates would be too small if split, and that certain versions of this template would be even more confusing and lack coherence with respect to phylogeny: a bit of Oceanic here and there, western branches (which should stay together even if they don't form a phylogenetic clade) also scattered over various places, if it were to be neither too large nor have too many very small templates, like in a revision I made to this template yesterday. PK2 (talk; contributions) 22:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Template:R fully protected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:R template-protected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:R extended-protected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:R semi-protected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:R protected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:R fully protected, Template:R template-protected, Template:R extended-protected, and Template:R semi-protected with Template:R protected.
Having five different templates for five different protection levels can easily cause things like incorrect protection templates being used when the protection level is changed. I think there should only be one template for all five protection levels. Awesome Aasim 21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete. No pages exist for any links on the template. Unlikely to exist in the future. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, empty template. LibStar (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Template:BlueButton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two transclusion template which is redundant to {{mw button|class=progressive}}. Convert the two uses to use {{mw button}} and then redirect to the different {{blue button}}. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Template:2013/14/15 Hawthorn triple premiership players (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused navbox other than in one user's sandbox. The articles linked use the stand-alone yearly one templates. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This template was replaced across all articles by a single user without discussion (e.g. [1]). But the equivalent template Template:2001/02/03 Brisbane Lions triple premiership players is still being used across all relevant articles, so the change was inconsistent with related articles. StAnselm (talk) 14:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Template:2007/09/11 Geelong triple premiership players (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused navbox other than in one user's sandbox. The articles linked use the stand-alone yearly one templates. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Has 2 English WP links, one of which is up for deletion. Not much point having a nav box for 2 entries. LibStar (talk) 02:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
No transclusions. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)