Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/One Museum Park

One Museum Park

Original - One Museum Park, the tallest building on the South Side of Chicago

Edit3 by TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) using GIMP to clone out helicopter shadow of hugin perspective-adjustment version using 3:2 aspect ratio

Edit4 by TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) using GIMP to clone out helicopter shadow of original

Edit5 by TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) using GIMP to clone out helicopter shadow of hugin perspective-adjustment version using 4:3 aspect ratio

Reason: This is a high EV photo
Articles this image appears in: One Museum Park
South Side (Chicago)
Central Station (Chicago neighborhood)
Near South Side, Chicago
List of tallest buildings in Chicago
Prairie Avenue
Creator: Ryan Kirby Hyperion924

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why is there a dot to the left in all three versions? Is it a helicopter? My preference is for edit2. I like how the building looks leaner and taller and I like the straight-on view in the edits, but if the aspect ratio's realistic then I prefer the one that is, but not until the dot is addressed. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Must be. Do you want me to get rid of it by cloning some sky?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now I'm between the original (preferably if you could get rid of the spot there, too) and in Support of Edit 3. After reading what Raeky said about altering the apparent angle to make it seem as though you're looking straight at building (amazing what we can with technology these days) does look better, but it seems to be better to keep vanishing points so height differences are easier to show. So... --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a strong preference for perspective correction at Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture, but I will try to get to the original later today.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit4 Edit 5 looks far to squashed. — raeky T 15:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit4. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Jujutacular ^talk 13:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus. Jujutacular ^talk 13:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe re-nominate. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]