Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Collaboration of the Week/History/Votes

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga | Collaboration of the Week | History

→ Anime and Manga Collaboration of the Week → History → Nominations and votes

This is an archive of the nominations and votes of successful ACOTWs.

October 2006

edit

Kino's Journey

edit

Nominated on 24 September 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 1 October 2006 to Saturday 7 October 2006

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:

There should be a list of episodes. Another good inclusion would be a descriptive list of the various countries Kino goes through. The manga of Kino's Journey will first appear in the U.S. in October 2006, and should supplement the existing entry. An analysis of themes would be welcome -- Kino's Journey is quite complex, and could include issues such as death and sacrifice, the complexity of human communication, how best to run a country, sexual ambiguity, etc.

Support
  1. choi9999 23:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. InsaneZeroG 02:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ganryuu (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

edit

Monster (manga)

edit

Nominated on 12 September 2006; Reinstated once; AMCOTW from Sunday 23 September 2006 to Saturday 30 September 2006

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
    • A Barren article with barely any organization, obviously incomplete sections, and is badly formatted.
Support
  1. TcDohl 15:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —Philip N.✉ 17:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Bebop

edit

Nominated on 4 September 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 19 September 2006 to Saturday 23 September 2006

Reason
  • I've tagged the article with {{Unreferenced}} and {{Original research}} tags. 99% of the article has no references, and the lone reference mark is inadequate. Also, it has too much fancruft embedded and prominently written as "fact" in the article without the aforementioned references. I'm desperately trying to find my CB manuals made by TOKYOPOP years ago to help out, but I know that those manuals won't be enough to bring the article up to "Good Article" a/or "Featured Article" status.
Support
  1. 293.xx.xxx.xx 08:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. The Nails 04:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment

Serial Experiments Lain

edit

Nominated on 28 August 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 10 September 2006 to Saturday 18 September 2006.

Reason
  • This major anime's page consists in only a list of "other material", a succint character list and a very personnal, very contested plot summary. The summary needs complete rewriting, it needs an episode list (13 episodes), a themes section, and a "theories & conclusions" section, critical as most of the story is left to the viewer's appreciation.
Support
  1. --SidiLemine 11:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. Arikel 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SeizureDog 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Elmer92413 04:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
It has an episode list. A pretty good one at that. See List of Serial Experiments Lain episodes. Considering how there are also episode articles it wouldn't take much to bring that up to Featured List quality either. A "Theories and conclusions" would end up being OR unless we could source it.--SeizureDog 00:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the episode list goes only to the 5th episode, and could do with some expanding. Ah, and the article needs a "reception & critics" section with documentation.--SidiLemine 13:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Easier said than done. An inability to cite references is killing us on anime articles. Happen to know if the DVDs offer any informative features? And that episode list also needs some Japanese titles. Though I wouldn't be suprised if it's the kind of show where the episode title is in English (in which case we should make the column just read "Episode title" instead of "English title"). I haven't seen it, so I don't know.--SeizureDog 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The episode titles really are in english, in the japanese and in the english version (and in the french one if i remember). As the Trivia section says : "The title at the beginning of each episode ("Layer") is announced by an Apple Computer program Whisper." --Arikel 21:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded then.--SeizureDog 22:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I own the series. I'll have to rewatch it and put some summaries in for the remaining episodes. I won't mind that. ;) And no the dvds don't have any commantaries or anything of the sort, but each of the 4 volumes does have an easter egg. I'll throw in their locations under the Trivia section. And given the very nature of the show any deeper insight is going to be speculative at best. Elmer92413 04:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

D.C. ~Da Capo~

edit

Nominated on 24 August 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 3 September 2006 to Saturday 9 September 2006.

Reason
  • This page is currently only about the game and the characters. It needs to have many more things, such as an episode list (both Da Capo and DCSS), a summary of both, and an anime sidebar thing (I don't know what you're supposed to call them). Those are only the things I could think of off the top of my head.
Support
  1. Clay 00:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Squilibob 05:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ganryuu (talk) 06:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serial Experiments Lain

edit

Nominated on 28 August 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 10 September 2006 to Saturday 18 September 2006.

Reason
  • This major anime's page consists in only a list of "other material", a succint character list and a very personnal, very contested plot summary. The summary needs complete rewriting, it needs an episode list (13 episodes), a themes section, and a "theories & conclusions" section, critical as most of the story is left to the viewer's appreciation.
Support
  1. --SidiLemine 11:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. Arikel 21:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SeizureDog 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Elmer92413 04:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
It has an episode list. A pretty good one at that. See List of Serial Experiments Lain episodes. Considering how there are also episode articles it wouldn't take much to bring that up to Featured List quality either. A "Theories and conclusions" would end up being OR unless we could source it.--SeizureDog 00:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the episode list goes only to the 5th episode, and could do with some expanding. Ah, and the article needs a "reception & critics" section with documentation.--SidiLemine 13:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Easier said than done. An inability to cite references is killing us on anime articles. Happen to know if the DVDs offer any informative features? And that episode list also needs some Japanese titles. Though I wouldn't be suprised if it's the kind of show where the episode title is in English (in which case we should make the column just read "Episode title" instead of "English title"). I haven't seen it, so I don't know.--SeizureDog 21:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The episode titles really are in english, in the japanese and in the english version (and in the french one if i remember). As the Trivia section says : "The title at the beginning of each episode ("Layer") is announced by an Apple Computer program Whisper." --Arikel 21:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded then.--SeizureDog 22:34, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I own the series. I'll have to rewatch it and put some summaries in for the remaining episodes. I won't mind that. ;) And no the dvds don't have any commantaries or anything of the sort, but each of the 4 volumes does have an easter egg. I'll throw in their locations under the Trivia section. And given the very nature of the show any deeper insight is going to be speculative at best. Elmer92413 04:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

edit

King of Bandit Jing

edit

Nominated on 18 August 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 21 August 2006 to Saturday 2 September 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page: It needs much more infomation, pictures, a correct infobox, and just a hell of alot of expansion.
Support
  1. dposse 16:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. G VOLTT 20:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

InuYasha

edit

Nominated on 7 August 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 20 August 2006 to Saturday 26 August 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
  • For full details, see Talk:InuYasha. InuYasha (and related pages) contain incorrect information, poor format, needs major cleanups, and various other problems. Being such a large series (manga is on 10th year) this is going to be a bit of work.
Support
  1. Zeno McDohl (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sasuke-kun27 02:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. llamallama
  4. Miss Ethereal 02:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neon Genesis Evangelion

edit

Nominated on 25 July 2006; Reinstated once; AMCOTW from Sunday 13 August 2006 to Saturday 19 August 2006.

Reason
Support
  1. Miss Ethereal 16:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 16:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geneshaft

edit

Nominated on 15 July 2006; Reinstated once; AMCOTW from Sunday 6 August 2006 to Saturday 12 August 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because there is a sore lack of information on the page, namely any plot summasis and such. Nevermind that it was a pretty bad show, it needs to stand as a warning to any others who are interested.
Support
  1. MooMan1 23:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Squilibob 00:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Finally an actual stub has been nominated. Good find. Ynhockey (Talk) 15:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I'll definitely contribute to a real stub. - Phorque 08:13, 4 August 2006

July 2006

edit

Mushishi

edit

Nominated on 16 July 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 30 July 2006 to Saturday 5 August 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because it lacks a lot of information, especially in regards to character details - there is not even a character section at the time of writing, and I feel that the plot section does not contain enough details regarding the storyline; it can certainly be expanded. More information regarding the manga, its movie adaptation and media information, etc. are also necessary. Mushishi was one of the most highly-rated titles in the past two years, winning two Tokyo Anime Awards, so I think it certainly deserves more attention. - Ganryuu 08:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support
  1. Ganryuu 08:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SeizureDog 20:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ashibaka tock 00:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --maru (talk) contribs 04:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ninku

edit

Nominated on 7 July 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 23 July 2006 to Saturday 29 July 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because of severe lack of information on the anime. No detailed information on Plot or characters even though it was a long running series (55 episodes) and also had inspired a game by the same name.
Support
  1. rohith 17:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. cdworetzky 22:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saber Marionette

edit

Nominated on 7 July 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 16 July 2006 to Saturday 22 July 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because there is little information on each of the series, in and one case no information. I think that a few people should work on this article to cover all the series and differences between plot and characters of them all. Perhaps the page could reach the stage where it could be split but it is very stub-like at the moment.
Support
  1. Chainzkai 09:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Squilibob 09:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Raquel Sama
  4. cdworetzky 07:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angel's Egg

edit

Nominated on 25 June 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 9 July 2006 to Saturday 15 July 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because there is no information on the plot, no character listing, and no voice actor listing.
Support
  1. Jedi of pi 19:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Redshift 5 00:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC) <- User has no edits before this vote --Farix[reply]
  3. Kunzite 01:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kaleido Star

edit

Nominated on 18 June 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 2 July 2006 to Saturday 8 July 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because it lacks a great deal of information. There is almost no character section to speak of, no information in English voice actors, no information about the second season or OVAs, no media information or criticism from reviewers, and no information on its reception by the audience.
Support
  1. TheFarix (Talk) 20:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

edit

TOKKO

edit

Nominated on 10 June 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 18 June 2006 to Saturday 24 June 2006

Reason
  • Basic information has been put into place, however, with its sudden popularity in both Japan, Europe and U.S., the article should be expanded for people who need to gain more information on the article. Although the manga has been around for couple of years, an article was not available until I created it. There aren't A LOT of information available on the Manga aspect of the series, and it is in need of a lot of information and pictures. With a week of work, it might actually become an article like the one for Bleach.
Support
  1. SinaH (Talk) --Lord 03:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Juhachi 04:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3000 Leagues in Search of Mother

edit

Nominated on 29 May 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 11 June 2006 to Saturday 17 June 2006

Reason
  • Very small article for one of the first internationally popular Japanese anime series. It was not popular in the US though (AFAIK).
Support
  1. Ynhockey (Talk) 21:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Samurai Deeper Kyo

edit

Nominated on 19 May 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 4 June 2006 to Saturday 10 June 2006.

Reason
  • Lacking a lot of information: characters, story/plot, episodes (possibly), differences between anime & manga, etc.
Support
  1. Clay 03:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. InsaneZeroG 18:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Monocrat 13:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hell Pyro 21:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lis sing 23:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

edit

Marmalade Boy

edit

Nominated on 2 May 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 28 May 2006 to Saturday 3 June 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
    • information needs organization; character introductions should be separated out of the plot section rather than mixed in
    • errors in spelling of character names, formatting
    • does not adequately explain differences between anime and manga
    • description of movie largely absent
Support
  1. Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 05:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 17:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lis sing 00:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Squilibob 00:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. cdworetzky 07:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Midori Days

edit

Nominated on 1 May 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 21 May 2006 to Saturday 27 May 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page
    • Unbalanced: Too much on characters side, not enough of everything else
    • Not much information on story.
    • For the source of our mascot character, this article is looking a little sparse.
    • While this isn't a stub article I think that the proposed mergers and copy edits could be collaborated on. Some more pictures would be nice - as would a proper manga comparison. --Squilibob 07:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support
  1. TcDohl 03:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Phorque (talk · contribs) 14:26, 01 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hobbit_Marco 11:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Squilibob 07:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kurigiri 17:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kunzite 05:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ToHeart2 (anime)

edit

Nominated on 22 April 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 14 May 2006 to Saturday 20 May 2006.

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page: No general information or storyline breakdown. A list-like stub article. Comparision to the original two anime could optionally be included.
Support
  1. Squilibob 02:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Karn-b 17:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Pikawil 01:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AnimeNfo.com

edit

Nominated on 22 April 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 7 May 2006 to Saturday 13 May 2006

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
    • Needs more details about why AnimeNfo is a notable website in compliance with WP:WEB
    • Lacks information about how the database in constructed and organized
    • Lacks information about how AnimeNfo is used by the anime community
    • Lacks a brief overview of the other sections of the website (reviews, forum, etc.)
    • Lacks a brief history of the website
Support
  1. TheFarix (Talk) 17:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Phorque (talk · contribs) 21:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ynhockey (Talk) 07:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 05:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

edit

Neo Ranga

edit

Nominated on 8 April 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 30 April to Saturday 6 May 2006

Reason
  • I'm surprised that an anime of Neo Ranga's force and quality is a mere stub.
  • It's an intriguing fantasy which deserves fuller treatment.
  • Presumably the problem is that, as with Photon (anime), it is not widely known.
Support
  1. Kencf 23:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Has decent length at 48 episodes, yet the article is extremely short. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 13:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Boy (anime)

edit

Nominated on 8 April 2006; AMCOTW from Sunday 23 April 2006 to Saturday 29 April 2006

Reasons
  • This article is still quite small after a long time and lacks a characters section or any appropriate screen-captures.
  • Not all studio, original run and tv-station etc. data is present in the infobox
  • I've watched it and I believe the series is fairly well known among us "Westerners" and it should therefore make for an easily researched and productive COTW.
Support
  1. Phorque (talk · contribs) 15:46, 08 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TcDohl 01:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Onizuka-gto 03:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Legend of the Galactic Heroes

edit

Nominated on 25 March 2006; AnCOTW from 16 April 2006 to 22 April 2006

Reason
  • This article is filled with fancruft and needs to split into subpages. As well, information from Legend of the Galactic Hero needs to be merged in a logical manner. Legend of the Galactic Hero ended up being a copyvio, I'll be nominating it for AfD later.
  • Very messy, in need of serious cleaning and organizing.
Support
  1. TheFarix (Talk) 17:17, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:03, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dave 22:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eikoku Koi Monogatari Emma

edit

Nominated on 5 March 2006, AnCOTW from 8 April 2006 to 15 April 2006

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
    • Imbalanced article, too much on the characters side, too little on the plot/story side.
    • Disorganized.
    • Needs to be moved back to "Emma (manga)" as this is the title of the anime, not the manga.
Support
  1. TcDohl 21:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lis sing 23:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dave 23:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Clayrocks369 02:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zillion

edit

Nominated 20 February 2006; AnCOTW from 1 April 2006 to 7 April 2006

Reason
  • Article lacks much information (character bios, theme songs, episode list, etc.), especially when compared to the Japanese version.
Support
  1. Alex anaya 06:00, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 65.95.149.200 22:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Katanin 21:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Y Ynhockey (Talk) Y 15:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Dave 02:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Miss Ethereal 21:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

edit

Zatch Bell!

edit

Nominated on 18 February 2006; AnCOTW from 26 March 2006 to 1 April 2006

Reason

This article has very little information on the actual series and needs more information. The personal character bios are also in need of updating. Some still need to be created

Support
  1. Magi of all 07:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Katanin 13:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. GatoGirl 12345 10:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Newget 18:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rabukurafuto 09:50, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tachikoma 03:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dave 02:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 00:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. dposse 14:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandread

edit

Nominated on 18 February 2006; AnCOTW from 18 March 2006 to 25 March 2006

Reason
  • Article is a literal sty (ahhh, puns). Bios and synopsis are poorly written and remain incomplete. There's no table for various broadcast airdates for both seasons of the show as well as the OVAs, barebones info given on the director and distributors, the manga taken from the anime goes unmentioned, and series run and other relevant information to the show is left undone. What little there is of character and story is significantly cropped at various points in the series and could use expansion.
Support
  1. Papacha 16:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Katanin 00:36, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Squilibob 06:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Voice of Treason 20:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Author X 06:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MarineCorps 14:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Onewingedangel9 01:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eyeshield 21

edit

Nominated on February 19 2006; AnCOTW from March 12 2006 to March 19 2006

Reason
  • This article needs attention because the following things are wrong with the page:
    • Been on the merge list for the last few months, yet no attention
    • Constantly edited by those who are... less skilled in the English Language
    • Bad grammar and spelling all around, including all its satellite articles, characters article, and the tournament article
    • Terribly incomplete in some areas, particularly in the main article, but way too much information in the satellite articles
    • Those who do edit the articles are defiant on the official Viz Media translations, opting for fansub, scanlation, or foreign language translation names (Although Viz Media is not perfect and can make mistakes) (Unsigned by 24.81.21.136 / talk)
Support
  1. TcDohl 23:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Squilibob 06:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. GatoGirl 12345 12:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Katanin 02:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Serujio 06:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Armadio 02:07, 04 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Onewingedangel9 01:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bleach

edit

Nominated on 5 February 2006; AnCOTW from 5 March 2006 to 12 March 2006

Voting suspended until a valid reason is given.

Reason
Bleach is a good anime and manga and needs better attention.

:That is not a valid reason. What does the page need to improve it?

The Zanpaktou section should get a clean up, and other things.
Support
  1. 71.103.106.156 5 February 2006
  2. Rozone 6 February 2006
  3. GatoGirl 12345 19 February 2006
  4. Katanin 18:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Newget 18:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Onewingedangel9 06:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006

edit

Planetes

edit

Nominated on February 2 2006; AnCOTW from 26 February 2006 to 5 March 2006

Reason
  • The Italian article was a featured article. It doesn't need much more, just a little push to make it featured article quality. It used to be a straight translation of the Italian article, and it's already much more than that. I've got a good feeling about this one.
Support
  1. TcDohl 02:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. nihon 02:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ned Scott 04:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Squilibob 09:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Apollonaire1980 00:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jhohenzollern 03:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Cyde Weys 05:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Loren 07:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • nihon 01:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC) This user already voted. This vote is now considered invalid.
  9. Katanin 15:54, 10 February 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Choi9999 05:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Papacha 16:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Onewingedangel222 02:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Admford 15:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Palm_Dogg 16:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC) -- I'll do screen captures if anyone wants (Have DVDs 1-4)[reply]
  15. Voice of Treason 20:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. timdream 15:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paranoia Agent

edit

Nominated on 18 January 2006; AnCOTW from 18 February 2006 to 25 February 2006

Reason
  • This article needs a serious rewrite. There is a lot of good info in it, but it's currently written more like a fan review than an encyclopedic article. --nihon 02:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support
  1. nihon 02:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neilworms 00:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Onewingedangel222 04:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Aihblsm 04:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ashmind 23:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Katanin 21:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lis sing 05:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Zyric 05:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Chris 02:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sean WI 02:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Choi9999 05:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fullmetal Alchemist

edit

Nominated on 7 February 2006; AnCOTW from 10 February 2006 to 17 February 2006

Reason
Fullmetal Alchemist is an important popular anime and manga, and deserves to get more attention.
That is not a valid reason. What does the page need to improve it?
There are several plots and lists that are badly written and incomplete.
Support
  1. Dieboybun 23:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nepharski 8:07 PM, 6 February 2006
  3. Szupie 13:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. maru (talk) contribs 21:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Crimson Alchemist 69.34.35.5
  6. Darkspym7 00:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Aeris of Iniquity 05:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Phorque 12:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. TomStar81 02:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Katanin 10:42, 10 Febrary 2006 (UTC)

Naruto

edit

Nominated on 25 January 2006; AnCOTW from 2 February 2006 to 9 February 2006

Reason
Support
  1. Ugur Basak 03:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JadziaLover 15:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sean WI 20:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Love Gaara 22:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rozone
  6. Notmoxie 17:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 68.221.181.58 19:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. DivineBaboon 03:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. MrTerrorist 01:06, 30 January 2006
  10. Duracinsky 12:21, 30 January 2006
  11. Hanami 13:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dieboybun
  13. Dewinduvae 16:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Katanin 16:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. AceMyth 01:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006

edit

List of English dubbed anime

edit

Nominated on 17 January 2006; AnCOTW from 25 January 2006 to 2 February 2006

Reason
  • I'm surprised that this list wasn't created earlier, it's very incomplete and with some collaboration could be very complete in almost no time. (Sorry, this isn't actually an article, it's a list. But I still think it's suitable for a collaboration project...)
Support
  1. Dave 00:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Midnightmoonradiance 04:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jhohenzollern 06:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ZeWrestler Talk 15:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Miss Ethereal 01:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spirited Away

edit

Nominated on 4 January 2006; AnCOTW from 17 January 2006 to 24 January 2006

Support
  1. Midnightmoonradiance 00:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CharlesWiki 22:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Phorque 15:40, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Squilibob 02:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jacoplane 21:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Please support Spirited Away or any other Ghibli anime! ^_^ The plot summary could use some refining and more in-depth analysis.
  • I'll show my support for this great movie. Yay Ghibli! - Phorque
  • It needs an infobox and a Characters section or seperate page. A lot of work needs to be done and some images are needed - Squilibob 02:36, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Collaboration_of_the_Week/History/Votes&oldid=1138368413"