Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 April 28

Help desk
< April 27 << Mar | April | May >> April 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 28

edit

19:15:31, 28 April 2015 review of submission by 73.185.110.198

edit


73.185.110.198 (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC) I would like to know if Don Ho was buried at sea. He was a friend of the family. We could not attend his memorial. James carson. Fellow USAF Veteran.[reply]

  This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what the Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps. Worldbruce (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:55:23, 28 April 2015 review of draft by Americold

edit


I'm really looking for help in unraveling the history of cold storage and Ernest Woodruft's involvement in the cold storage industry in Atlanta. I've listed as many of the involved companies as I'm aware of but any additional assistance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance! Americold (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure that anyone will help unless it catches someone's interest. What I suggest you do is ask on the Teahouse Questions Forum, and also do your best to create a stub article, submit it for review, and act on the advice you receive. However, your username is against you. We have a policy against usernames that appear to be commercial. WP:CHU will help you.
Is "Americold' the right name for the article? Please think about that, too. Fiddle Faddle 21:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:56:46, 28 April 2015 review of submission by Spagan

edit


Hello,

This is my first wiki article. I think I followed the format from the tutorial correctly but I just wanted to make sure. I included the disclosure and as many references as I could initially get together. I would love to know if I left anything out or could do anything better before I start my next article.

Thank you, Samara Spagan (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to submit it for review. You can do this by placing {{subs:submit}} at the head. If you want to know what it does, use the preview button.
It will be pushed back to you for more work. That is fine and to be expected. It requires references that are not the gentleman;s work, which is only a valid reference in special circumstances. Let me try to explain. If s/he manufactured vacuum cleaners, the cleaners would be her/his work. A vacuum cleaner could not be a reference for her/him, simply because it is the product he makes. So it is with research. However, a review of her/his work by others tends to be a review of her/him and her/his methods, so is a reference, as is a peer reviewed paper a reference for her/his work. You may find WP:ACADEME of some use in seeing how Wikipedia and Academe differ hugely
The disclosure should be moved to the talk page. Please also deploy {{connected contributor}} on the talk page Thank you for the clear disclosure. Fiddle Faddle 21:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]