Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 December 1
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 30 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 2 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 1
edit
- Hangzhaohans (talk · contribs)
{{Lafc|username=Hangzhaohans|ts=01:19:21, 1 December 2015|link=
Hangzhaohans (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Hangzhaohans: I am not sure what you are asking here. The draft as it stands cannot be accepted regardless of any merits because it is full of extraneous material. Are you getting the right level of guidance from your course leader, Skearns4, here? We have seen many articles from your fellow course members which suffer from varying degrees of what appears to be lack of guidance. You need to take this up with the course leader.
- Please also see thsi help desk query (note that it will move to archives at some future point) where two of us express concern about the course direction. Fiddle Faddle 12:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- In order to try to help you further I have posted a request about this course here Fiddle Faddle 12:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
12:57:35, 1 December 2015 review of submission by BOTFIGHTER
edit- BOTFIGHTER (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
BOTFIGHTER (talk) 12:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Why my project was declined???BOTFIGHTER (talk) 12:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- @BOTFIGHTER: Because it is not now, and cannot be considered ever to be the basis of, an article. Why did you think this was worthy of submission? This is just a statement about who you are. Fiddle Faddle 12:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
21:59:19, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Smcmurry97
edit- Smcmurry97 (talk · contribs)
I currently have my sandbox being reviewed to go live. I noticed on my edit screen there are seven references and all the foot notes I put in. However, on the read page it only shows four references and takes out all of the footnotes for the three references it doesn't show. I was wondering how to get all seven references on the read screen, or if it'll all be fixed once the article goes live.
Smcmurry97 (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm really unsure. All I can suggest is that you check with great care what has happened. It's possible that you have confused yourself with using the same reference(s) so many times. Zoom in on the screen (literally zoom! Embiggen it!) and analyse what has happened. Fiddle Faddle 22:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)