Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 19

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

September 19

12:24:40, 19 September 2015 review of submission by Badspice

• Badspice (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tamas Bartfai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Badspice (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I am puzzled by the reviewer's comment about checking the inline references I used. They are according to normal conventions, and the references are as listed in PubMed. Reviewer was Oo7565. I have been a science publisher for 30+ years, and I thought my draft was very polished! Maybe I'm just blind to my own mistakes, but the reference is Draft: Tamas Bartfai. How do I communicate with Oo7565 to find out what she/he thought was incorrectly executed. Thanks, Badspice

@Badspice I suspect that Oo7565 might have been confused by the fact that only the last section of your draft actually has references. You need to reference the rest of it before it can be accepted. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

12:36:22, 19 September 2015 review of submission by 124.125.230.34

• 124.125.230.34 (talk · contribs)
  • No draft specified!

124.125.230.34 (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

If you have a question about why Draft:Umer Jubapu was declined, it's because the draft cites no references. You need references, like, for example, in Palak Muchhal. To prove the subject is notable, there must be multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, and they must provide a significant depth of coverage about the subject. Worldbruce (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)