Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 November 26

Help desk
< November 25 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 26

edit

02:39:44, 26 November 2017 review of submission by 66.190.13.95

edit


66.190.13.95 (talk) 02:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Hi My name is Rosalind Kealiher, I am an acquaintance of Valentina Peguero and really wanted to create a page in her honor. She is a semi well known author in the US and especially in the Dominican Republic. Obviously I am not a good writer and I also don't have a lot of time. Is there someone out there who would be willing to write a wikipedia page about her? How would I go about finding the right person?[reply]

Hi Rosalind. To request that an article be written, go to Wikipedia:Requested articles and follow the directions. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05:08:57, 26 November 2017 review of draft by Julia mji

edit


Can anyone please check if my draft is ok. I think this time I have proper text and links

Julia mji (talk) 05:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Julia mji: That looks like a reasonable start. I would add something to the lead that lets readers (and our reviewer) know why this artist is important. Also the middle paragraph in the Career section has no citations and reviewers may take issue with that as our requirements are fairly stringent for articles about living persons. ~Kvng (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06:31:09, 26 November 2017 review of submission by Rogerroger3782

edit


It was mentioned to me that I can ask here for more information about why the page was declined. I know I did not have a lot of content for the page yet, as I am new to this.

For notability, I see you want news sources, but all I really have are gaming sources. The only thing I know of is they were in a printed version of the indie game magazine.

I guess I can just include the links I have?

https://waypoint.vice.com/en_us/article/3dpd8n/remembering-from-softwares-forgotten-mech-classic-chromehounds http://www.gamestar.de/artikel/mav-kickstarter-aktion-fuer-mech-actionspiel-gestartet,3032537.html https://www.engadget.com/2014/02/09/mav-follows-in-the-giant-robot-footprints-of-chromehounds/ https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/05/01/mav-released-steam-early-access/#more-204833/ https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/07/28/87-bazillion-mechs-m-a-v-is-a-gearheads-dream/#more-117964/ https://kotaku.com/http-www-youtube-com-watch-v-w00hp8nraxe-this-is-m-a-1517297863 https://www.pcgamesn.com/indie/mav-lego-mech-games https://www.pcgamesn.com/best-new-indie-games-pc-november-05-17 http://archive.beefjack.com/index.html%3Fp=138607.html http://www.nerd-age.com/m-v-kickstarter-spotlight/ http://cliqist.com/2014/02/07/old-is-new-again-in-m-a-v/

I am not sure if any of these count.

Rogerroger3782 (talk) 06:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rogerroger3782: We're looking for WP:RELIABLE sources. I'm not able to definitively determine which of these are reliable and which are not. I suspect you'll have trouble convincing us that an indie game magazine could be a reliable journalistic source. But, I did look at these pages and found most don't eveN mention Bombdog by name. There are only two ([1], [2]) that could possibly be construed as having the required level of coverage. You don't have a very strong case for meeting our notability guidelines at this point. You can continue to look for better sources but sometimes the coverage just doesn't exist and no amount of work on the draft will cause it to appear. ~Kvng (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kvng: Thank you for looking at it. The VICE waypoint article does mention Bombdog Studios, but it has a typo as Boomdog instead. Vice, Kotaku, Engadget, are these not the right type of coverage? They all mention M.A.V. the game and Chad Mauldin the creator. Would those have enough coverage to be considered notable? Just trying to fully understand the requirements.
@Rogerroger3782: WP:SIGCOV describes the level of coverage we're looking for. There is not enough coverage of Bombdog Studios or Chad Mauldin; the coverage is about the game. There is potentially significant coverage of M.A.V. but it is probably WP:TOOSOON for an article about a game that does not and may not ever exist. ~Kvng (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:46:47, 26 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Sextv29

edit



Sextv29 (talk) 09:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sextv29: Hello, Sextv. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the great delay in response. But you didn't actually ask a question. Is there something specific that we can help you with? NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:50:39, 26 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Amunyer

edit



Arthur Munyer 20:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

@Amunyer: Hello, Arthur. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the great delay in response. But you didn't actually ask a question. Is there something specific that we can help you with? NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]